not really, since it isn't a public poll. you've got nothing to lose.OS said:Hmmmmm... Most ppl voting on this poll are actually virgins. Brownie points for honesty.
not really, since it isn't a public poll. you've got nothing to lose.OS said:Hmmmmm... Most ppl voting on this poll are actually virgins. Brownie points for honesty.
I never meant it like that fool. I meant we could fix the virginity problem and not tell anyone!soha said:this is the way i interpret it
we dont have to spread the word that i am a bos slut
because everyone knows?
if thats what u mean..then haha..im the bos virgin mary
if anything...
aha i c50Cent said:I never meant it like that fool. I meant we could fix the virginity problem and not tell anyone!
It's harder to get casual sex than to get sex once you're in a relationship. It's all about conquest.Ribbon said:This is a bit of a random thought... but guys congratulate other guys that have had sex with alot of girls, think they are a 'stud' ect. but in terms of real sexual experience it is the guys in long term relationships, ie, that have sex at least once a day as opposed to getting lucky 2 weekends a month, who would be the 'real' studs.
So my point is, assuming anything you want to take into account (endowment, natural skill or whatever) is equal, you get more out of sex with a guy who has only had sex with one or two long term girls for a total of possibly many 100's of times, than a guy who has had sex with 10 girls, but only a grand total of 10 times.
No way, it's about quality over quantity. It's cooler to sleep with many women, than it is to have sex a million times with the same woman. As waf said, it's about conquest, it's not just about the sex.Ribbon said:This is a bit of a random thought... but guys congratulate other guys that have had sex with alot of girls, think they are a 'stud' ect. but in terms of real sexual experience it is the guys in long term relationships, ie, that have sex at least once a day as opposed to getting lucky 2 weekends a month, who would be the 'real' studs.
So my point is, assuming anything you want to take into account (endowment, natural skill or whatever) is equal, you get more out of sex with a guy who has only had sex with one or two long term girls for a total of possibly many 100's of times, than a guy who has had sex with 10 girls, but only a grand total of 10 times.
being horny is just as good of a reason aswell.markmooks said:That would be one of the dumbest reasons to sleep with someone. I'd rather do it because you want to enjoy some pleasure with them and spend time with them. You don't have to be in love but it helps. Like and lust are good enough reasons as well.
Yeah, and the "I fuck paper cups" option.AsyLum said:Wheres the "I fuck trees" option ?
brings new meaning to getting 'your dick wet'jumb said:Yeah, and the "I fuck paper cups" option.
... it does?Meads said:brings new meaning to getting 'your dick wet'
markmooks said:So is $180/hour
Yes, I know how wrong that is.
how do you know how much it is?funniboi said:wtf ? $180 an hour ? thats cheap, compared to most places is $150 for 30mins...