Nice... took me a while to figure out the 2 squares lol
==========
I think he let x = lnu and used int by substitutionHow?
The constant term does not cancel out. I think you have made a silly mistake.
Isn't it pretty obvious once you multiply numerator and denominator by ex?I think he let x = lnu and used int by substitution
I would have accepted the answer with only the above sentence ^^I think he let x = lnu and used int by substitution
Thank you =)Wtf lol
made a typo:The constant term does not cancel out. I think you have made a silly mistake.
Ah yes ok.made a typo:
and so the 1's disappear
(;hahahahhahaha it's just a tad obvious
Well not entirely, he should probably change the log to something else. Logs explode at 0 so its not at all clear that the integral is well defined .hahahahhahaha it's just a tad obvious
lol I got ownedWell not entirely, he should probably change the log to something else. Logs explode at 0 so its not at all clear that the integral is well defined .