Induced EMF and Lenz's Law (1 Viewer)

cutemouse

Account Closed
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
2,250
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Hello,

I'm trying to get my head around Lenz's law.

And so far, I'm yet to figure out when it applies.

When you move a conductor through a magnetic field, the direction of current is given by the right hand motor rule or push rule.

But when I tried doing questions asking where the induced EMF flows, according to Lenz's law the current flows in the opposite direction to the RH motor or push rule.

Why is this?
 

tommykins

i am number -e^i*pi
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
5,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
i'm capped so i can't open youtube.

anyways go on youtube and look up 'motors and generators' and then loook for the indian guy and a white board.

he'll explain everything to you (it was my study for motors and generators :p)
 

Pwnage101

Moderator
Joined
May 3, 2008
Messages
1,408
Location
in Pursuit of Happiness.
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
jm01 said:
Hello,

I'm trying to get my head around Lenz's law.

And so far, I'm yet to figure out when it applies.

When you move a conductor through a magnetic field, the direction of current is given by the right hand motor rule or push rule.

But when I tried doing questions asking where the induced EMF flows, according to Lenz's law the current flows in the opposite direction to the RH motor or push rule.

Why is this?
lenz's law - it OPPOSES the direction u see from the RHP rule

it's hard to explain over the net like this, but yeh try watchin a vid it might help
 

scora

Member
Joined
May 1, 2008
Messages
96
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
i'm capped so i can't open youtube.

anyways go on youtube and look up 'motors and generators' and then loook for the indian guy and a white board.

he'll explain everything to you (it was my study for motors and generators :p)
is there anything youtube can't do?
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
80
Location
Newcastle
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
Faraday; an emf and current is induced in a conductor when there is a change in magnetic flux through the conductor
Lenz; to obey the conservation of energy, the current must be such that it produces a magnetic field that opposes the change in magnetic flux.

Otherwise, energy would be continually created since the induced current would produce a magnetic field that would intensify the changing magnetic field inducing it.
When you are doing questions, remember that induced current is opposite to the direction of normal current. The induced current must produce a field that opposes the change in flux

hope it makes sense
:)

btw lenz's law applies when there is current [and emf] induced by a magnetic field
 

youngminii

Banned
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
2,083
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Ye so it's just a law that's there so that the generator obeys the conservation of energy.
Whenever a questions asks 'which direction will the current be induced' for a generator, it's always in the opposite direction to the right hand palm rule as a result of this law.
This law doesn't apply in DC motors though so don't get confused.
 

Tully B.

Green = procrastinating
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Messages
1,068
Location
inner-westish
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
It's not when you "push" a conductor through a magnetic field, it's when a current flows through that conductor. You can push all you want, but there won't be force without current. You could say that when you push a "current-carrying conductor" into a magnetic field, it experiences force. That works.

The only reason that I ranted about that minor error (which probably wouldn't even lose you a mark) is because I have let to have learned Lenz's law. Doing that tonight. Sorry :)
 

Tully B.

Green = procrastinating
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Messages
1,068
Location
inner-westish
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Lol Tully B, you're thinking of a motor.
No, I was talking about the general law governing a conductor within a magnetic field, and making the unneccesary comment that the conductore would have to have a current flowing through it in order to be affected by the field, and that the direction in which the conductor was "pushed" into the magnetic field had nothing to do with the field's effect on it.
 

k02033

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
239
Location
Parramatta
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
No, I was talking about the general law governing a conductor within a magnetic field, and making the unneccesary comment that the conductore would have to have a current flowing through it in order to be affected by the field, and that the direction in which the conductor was "pushed" into the magnetic field had nothing to do with the field's effect on it.
Thats not true generally since an object cant possibly experience a magnetic force, if its velocity is parallel the the B field.
 

meggo-meggo

New Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2010
Messages
26
Gender
Female
HSC
2010
hahah yeah, I'm a little slow with things like that... one year too late. dammit!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top