Yes. What's your point?onebytwo said:using ur logic -
iran and north korea are nations, then there allowed to have their own weapons
I suppose when you said UN Council, you were referring to UN Scecurity Council. As of today, there are no UN Security Council meeting on Israeli raid of Hizbollah weapons transfer or any demand made by the UN Security Council. The only comments made so far from the UN is from Kofi Annan.tempco said:Yet when the UN Council and Lebanese officials demanded evidence that Hezbollah were actually transporting weapons through the Lebanon-Syria border, Israel didn't deliver. I was listening to a radio interview on ABC Radio, and some Israeli official gave the impression that providing evidence to the UN wasn't necessary, and that the supposed evidence "will be released in due time".
Hahahaha, god you're funny.Aryanbeauty said:I suppose when you said UN Council, you were referring to UN Scecurity Council. As of today, there are no UN Security Council meeting on Israeli raid of Hizbollah weapons transfer or any demand made by the UN Security Council. The only comments made so far from the UN is from Kofi Annan.
BOUDAI, Lebanon — Israeli commandos dropped deep into Lebanon on Saturday, clashing with Hezbollah fighters in a raid here that left one Israeli soldier dead and put the first serious strain on the region's 6-day-old cease-fire.
"There was an attempt to bring in weaponry from Syria to Lebanon," Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev said. "The resolution calls for there to be Lebanese soldiers and international force there on the border crossings to prevent this from happening. Unfortunately, they're not there at the moment. In the interim period, we can't have a situation where Hezbollah is smuggling weapons and is rearming and regrouping."
But Israel produced no evidence of intercepted weapons. And the depth of the Israeli raid — 60 miles inside Lebanon — led to widespread speculation that the commandos might have been on a mission to rescue two Israeli soldiers seized by Hezbollah. Their capture in July was the spark for ferocious fighting between Israel and Hezbollah.
Still, the Israeli army said it would continue cross-border raids until "proper monitoring bodies are established on the Lebanese borders." It gave few details of Saturday's raid, although it said the goals of the operation were "achieved in full."
No, it doesn't give Israel the right to do anything. Israel's jumping the gun, and isn't giving the peacekeeping force a realistic time frame to get things in order.Aryanbeauty said:It is the duty of Lebanese troops and UNFIL to prevent this but as it failed to do so, Israel have the right to act.
I'm not a Hezbollah supporter. I condemn the killing of Israeli civilians by Hezbollah as much as I condemn the killing of Lebanese civilians by the IDF.Aryanbeauty said:Another hizbollah supporter's lies exposed!
Well, I assumed that ABC Radio is a reliable source. I guess you think otherwise.Aryanbeauty said:Overheard on a radio and post it as a fact?
Aryanbeauty said:How about you go to a UN website and check the original statement itself? Koffi Annan statements here
What do you think they talked about? I'm not too sure, but most probably about the reasons why Israel broke the ceasefire, and then the question that usually follows is: "Do you have any evidence?"The Secretary-General has today spoken to the Prime Ministers of Israel and Lebanon about this matter.
My visual lust? Don't you think Israel should have alerted the UN of the alleged movement of weapons across the Syria-Lebanon border and presented the evidence so that there would be no risk of the ceasefire being broken by Hezbollah as well?Aryanbeauty said:Israel is not obliged to provide evidence to satisfy your visual lust. Every demand of evidence should come from proper channels in the UN through its committees. So far there is no demand from either the Secretary general or UN Security Council.
How is that a ceasefire? And again, if Israel is so sure of Hezbollah receiving munitions from Syria and Iran, why doesn't it pass on the evidence to the UN so that proper measures can be taken to prevent this, instead of destabilising an already unstable situation?Aryanbeauty said:Israel will not sit idle while Hizbollah are re-arming themselves with weapons from Syria and Iran which is a violation of the UN resolution. Realistically, UN troops have so far failed to arrive in the numbers promised and in the meantime Israel have the right to enforce the resolution.
I'd never agree to the indiscriminate killing of civilians. But of course, as many pro-Israeli posters here tend to think, you're either with Isreal or with the terrorists, right?Aryanbeauty said:I am yet to find your post in which you condemn hizbollah, in fact most of them are pro-hizbollah and anti-Israel.
australians when they want to becodereder said:http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/australians-trapped-by-blockade/2006/07/14/1152637848976.html
There are 25000 Australians in Lebanon, John Howard doesnt give a dam.
When was that post made?Crestwood's_G said:australians when they want to be
The point of presenting evidence isn't to stop the movement of weapons per se. It's to prevent the war from escalating further.Aryanbeauty said:Presenting evidence does not prevent transfer of weapons, how do UN which is yet to send a single combat soldiers to Lebanon is going to prevent a transfer already going on by telephoning hizbollah Hello?
What the fuck are you smoking?the country cannot even produce enough Petrol for its own use
Perhaps you need to ask that to yourself.Not-That-Bright said:What the fuck are you smoking?
whats all the fuss from the US about iran and nth korea having WMDsCalculon said:Yes. What's your point?
that is so messed up, and they wnat to appeal???!!tempco said: