It should be OK for predatory women to rape boys (1 Viewer)

[neo o]

Because according to the SMH, it's likely that in later life only one in 10 boys will claim that their life had been adversely affected by what had occured (of course, they neglected to provide statistics about women).

http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/se...inition-of-rape/2005/08/12/1123353501616.html

Even when a woman takes advantage of a 13 y/o boy frequently over a period of three months, what she did is described as an "affair" and she's able to get away with only 9 months in jail. (The article devotes a nice, chunky paragraph to how "gorgeous" she is and includes a piccy, obviously the boy wasn't raped by his teacher, he got lucky!).

http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/te...ir-with-student/2005/08/12/1123353501628.html

I know this has been discussed ALOT in here, but since it's current again it's probably worth bringing up. Does anyone pick up a double standard?

 

[supercharged]

I wouldn't call it rape if the boy got a boner from it, more like a willing participant

 

[Xayma]

I wouldn't call it rape if the boy got a boner from it, more like a willing participant

So if a woman orgasms it isn't rape?

miss_gtr: Can women be raped by men?

Can "boys unwillinging [sic] get a boner?" Umm that is pretty much all puberty is for boys.

 

[hipsta_jess]

Thats the question, are men/boys able to resist getting an erection, even if they don't want sex it is questionable how much control they have over their penis.

 

[Xayma]

So Boys can be raped by women?



Whydo women get off lighter.. as in terms of Jail etc.

Because society leads to the idea that men are sex crazed and should be able to look after themselves.

It is also statutory rape, fewer cases of violent rape are reported (won't know how many actually occur). Although a 17 year old female was charged recently over an attack on a male boy involving sodomy with a rolling pin etc.

 

[withoutaface]

Thats the question, are men/boys able to resist getting an erection, even if they don't want sex it is questionable how much control they have over their penis.

In general its easy to get it up without even doing much, but getting it down is more difficult.

 

[neo o]

I wouldn't call it rape if the boy got a boner from it, more like a willing participant

If a male teacher has sex with a consenting female student, it's still rape if she's under age. The entire reason for there being an age of consent is because it's assumed that children under that age aren't capable of making decisions for themselves (and to prevent adults from taking advantage of them). As people have said, it's all about abuse of power.

I think that quote is true, its psychological and abusing a position and so I think they should be treated fairly evenly. Besides, that study about only 1 in 10 boys saying it has had a negative impact should be criticised.

I'd like to see a comparative statistic for females. Would a rape still effect a woman negatively ten years after it occured? You'd hope not.

 

[Not-That-Bright]

Thankyou Asquithian.... It's all about consent, if a boy does not consent, but he still gets his rocks off from it... It's still rape.

I'm not really sure If I'm too fond of statistics about males and sexual abuse, I feel a male is quite a different social animal to a female. Much more, "Who cares, keep your chin up - faggot!". Even if they've come out and said "I don't care, I'm ok with it now." Wouldn't it still be rape if the defendent (at the time) had the intent and the actions?

 

[White Rabbit]

I wouldn't call it rape if the boy got a boner from it, more like a willing participant

You idiot. Men, esspecially adolsecent boys, can be forced to react - you can make a bloke get hard without him wanting to. It's the same as running a blade down someones arm - they will bleed and possibly scream, they will feel pain, but does that mean they want it, simply because the victim screams, bleeds and feels pain? No, it's a natural reaction, its the way your body will reaction to certain stimulation. Just as rubbing a man the right way will cause an erection regardless of his wishes. Just as women who organism during rape aren't held accountable, as a talented perp could cause his victim to do just that, why would it be any diffrent for men? Esspecially a child, a boy who is only just coming into puberty and all he's really aware of in regards to his sexuality is his penis is no longer just there for pissing, and he likes this ew found use. Women in power then take advantage of the insecurity and confusion puberty brings about and uses them to her on advantage. How is that any different from a male in power twisting a young girl of 11 or 12 who has been starved of emotional support, and needing to be loved, by anyone? It's exaclty the same, the fact is, the law states that a child under 16 is unable to consent as they don't have the emotional or mental capacity to fully understand what they're getting into. Did most people on this board completley understand the implications and possible consequences at 12? Sure, you may have known facts, you may have een able to perform the actual act, but did you really understand the full extent of what you were doing?

Furthermore, I'm quite sick of these double standards. Not only is adult male rape swept under the carpet, problems such as domestic violence against men is practically laughed at. Crimes like these committed against women as seen as henious violations, yet if a man is the victim, it's almost socially acceptable.

If you see a guy hit a girl down at your pub, you'll see 5 other guys jump in and protect her. Yet, if a girl hits a bloke, men will laugh and women cheer her on. She can hit him, but if he dare retaliate, the whole bar will be against him. What kind of double standard is that? Women want to fight for equal rights, but only in certain areas, some we can just ignore aye?

 

[Not-That-Bright]

I don't think men have too much to fear from women per se, but more from men.

 

[Iron]

...Penetration has a lot to do with it I think.

 

[White Rabbit]

I don't think men have too much to fear from women per se, but more from men.

LOL mate, go and check out the Parramatta Womens 1st Grade Union team and tell me you're not scared of them

I'll grant you men could generally do more damage, but that doesn't change the fact women can be violent and aggressive too, and can hurt men. But it's practically ignored, I've met plenty of nasty women who will beat up anyone who pisses them off.

 

[Cyph]

You idiot. Men, esspecially adolsecent boys, can be forced to react - you can make a bloke get hard without him wanting to. It's the same as running a blade down someones arm - they will bleed and possibly scream, they will feel pain, but does that mean they want it, simply because the victim screams, bleeds and feels pain? No, it's a natural reaction, its the way your body will reaction to certain stimulation. Just as rubbing a man the right way will cause an erection regardless of his wishes. Just as women who organism during rape aren't held accountable, as a talented perp could cause his victim to do just that, why would it be any diffrent for men? Esspecially a child, a boy who is only just coming into puberty and all he's really aware of in regards to his sexuality is his penis is no longer just there for pissing, and he likes this ew found use. Women in power then take advantage of the insecurity and confusion puberty brings about and uses them to her on advantage. How is that any different from a male in power twisting a young girl of 11 or 12 who has been starved of emotional support, and needing to be loved, by anyone? It's exaclty the same, the fact is, the law states that a child under 16 is unable to consent as they don't have the emotional or mental capacity to fully understand what they're getting into. Did most people on this board completley understand the implications and possible consequences at 12? Sure, you may have known facts, you may have een able to perform the actual act, but did you really understand the full extent of what you were doing?

Furthermore, I'm quite sick of these double standards. Not only is adult male rape swept under the carpet, problems such as domestic violence against men is practically laughed at. Crimes like these committed against women as seen as henious violations, yet if a man is the victim, it's almost socially acceptable.

If you see a guy hit a girl down at your pub, you'll see 5 other guys jump in and protect her. Yet, if a girl hits a bloke, men will laugh and women cheer her on. She can hit him, but if he dare retaliate, the whole bar will be against him. What kind of double standard is that? Women want to fight for equal rights, but only in certain areas, some we can just ignore aye?

You're solid as!

If a woman's wet, does it mean she's turned on?

 

[Rorix]

women like sex as much as men, guys. don't let them fool you.

 

[iamsickofyear12]

The point of difference is, I think, boys and men are much more willing to consent to females than females are to consent to men.

That's like me. My consent is very easy to get as long as I am single and you are a not bad looking female (and as far as I am aware disease free). And even then not bad part starts to fade away if I drink too much.

Apart from that the only problem I would have was if a chick was trying to "rape" me when I had something else important to do. But if I had the time then no worries really.

 

[loquasagacious]

Under the definitions being bandied about a drunk or underage girl who consents to sex has not been raped....

 

[supercharged]

pffft, a woman doesn't get an orgasm if she is raped against her will, and a guy doesn't get an errection if he isn't attracted to, or if he's trying to escape from the scary woman 'raping' him. Having an orgasm or errection is not purely physical like a machine, the person has to be in a receptive state of mind.

 

[Serius]

yeah my uncle, well he isnt really my uncle just a guy who used to be a friend of the familes, he is this little scrawny dude who invests in the stock market or some shit, and he married this big butch chich who was like in a biker gang[ no joke] so the marriage went fine, they had a kid... and then she wanted a divorce, started beating him up and shit... so David went to the cops and they just laughed at him, even though he had a black eye and bruisinsg and shit they thought he was joking. then his wife got custody of the kid when they got a divorce


so what happenns if a young bloke like 15 rapes an older girl? who is raping who?

 

[heybraham]

rape is a crime of violence, not sex.

 

[Not-That-Bright]

rape is a crime of violence, not sex.

So sex has nothing to do with rape?