Legal Studies Predictions/Thoughts (2 Viewers)

[bas216]

oM

OMG
apparently
if they were facetiming
it means he was actually there
and committed the crime SO THEYRE BOTH PRINCIPLE FIRST DEGREE FRICKK

there’s no way surely facetiming has to be 2nd degree

 

[bas216]

also i did 2 paragraphs on transnational and 1 on statutory guidlines for sentencing i was lowkey confused what to write on

 

[ilikemomo]

also i did 2 paragraphs on transnational and 1 on statutory guidlines for sentencing i was lowkey confused what to write on

bro i also did 2 paras ur not alone
i did 3 for each of my options too i think my life is over

 

[clay293]

Wow Legal was so easy

How did you even post this exam ended 12:30

 

[aerithgainsborough]

How did you even post this exam ended 12:30

 

[civiclens]

oM

OMG
apparently
if they were facetiming
it means he was actually there
and committed the crime SO THEYRE BOTH PRINCIPLE FIRST DEGREE FRICKK

it wouldn't be. chris would be second degree, as if he was facetiming while there, he could give instructions, but he isn't the one physically carrying out the crime.

 

[ilikemomo]

it wouldn't be. chris would be second degree, as if he was facetiming while there, he could give instructions, but he isn't the one physically carrying out the crime.

its what my friend said but i rlly hope ur right cuz i did chris only as second degree

 

[civiclens]

did anyone else only interpret it as talking about only the australian federal criminal system, not NSW... it was weird.

i mean if everyone did bad, scaling only improves!

 

[bas216]

guys did you

did anyone else only interpret it as talking about only the australian federal criminal system, not NSW... it was weird.

i mean if everyone did back, scaling only improves!

yeah that confused me so i did 2 paragraphs on transnational then one on purely domestic for statutory guidlines in nsw i said its through residual powers etc but hopefully its fine

 

[yourbestfriend]

guys it wasn't an international crime question! as long as you had one para on transnational crime, e.g. human trafficking, the rest can pretty much be anything from the whole crime topic

 

[bas216]

its what my friend said but i rlly hope ur right cuz i did chris only as second degree

same

 

[civiclens]

[

guys did you

yeah that confused me so i did 2 paragraphs on transnational then one on purely domestic for statutory guidlines in nsw i said its through residual powers etc but hopefully its fine

reallll... i was like i have to do 2 paragraphs on transnational in case i read it wrong...

 

[bas216]

also for the judge alone trial Q did anyone say the difference is that the judge provides reasons for the verdict?

 

[ilikemomo]

also for the judge alone trial Q did anyone say the difference is that the judge provides reasons for the verdict?

i said this
but onky bc all the other options sounded like fun facts

 

[bas216]

i said this
but onky bc all the other options sounded like fun facts

yessss i’m 95% sure i’ve done a multi like that in a past paper too

 

[hey2737]

Apparenlty according to BOCSAR: judge-alone trials are more likely to result in an acquittal compared with jury trials so does that mean it was B?

 

[ajksdfoasiudh]

legal was a GIFT FROM GOD
mc was dead
Hr was so good
But crime was beautiful I had so much time so did 2 and 2 on AFP/ABF and terrorism and then bail and imprisonment

then options was amazing compliance took me a little bit of thinking for consumers but I framed it rlly well I think - like how every bit of non compliance either strengthens or weakens in diff aspects and also overall non compliance
And then family was very standard changing values leading to changing law reform leading to either justice and not justice when family law fails to reflect
wrote total of8 extra booklets

 

[ajksdfoasiudh]

Apparenlty according to BOCSAR: judge-alone trials are more likely to result in an acquittal compared with jury trials so does that mean it was B?

I was thinking this but it’s not a key feature - it’s a consequence

 

[cayden7777]

wtf was that multiple choice… i had like no c’s. also were we only suppose to talk about the federal legal system…

My first 10 mcq had no c lol

 

[ajksdfoasiudh]

what was that stupid fucking crypto question