Love (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter SKA
- Start date
berry580
Member
In case you couldn't read all of what I wrote, I said "preferably......". Meaning it's preferabe, but not a necessity (but the weight limit is, with the cut off point at 70kg (or maybe a few kg extension if your weight concentrate in 2 paricular areas, not the @SS).withoutaface said:someone's shallow...
HAHAHA....
concession
Respected Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2004
- Messages
- 195
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2004
mack
Banned
berry580 said:
Have fun with your right hand and your Boa pics, because with that attitude thats all you'll be getting.
berry580
Member
LOL, you take things too seriously.mack said:
J
jhakka
Guest
Laughing at your own jokes with "lol" in caps just makes you look lamer.berry580 said:
berry580
Member
What? Are you offfended?jhakka said:
Good. Please refer to the relevant part of my signature then (with common sense. If you have any at all, that is.).
J
jhakka
Guest
No. I just think its lame.
And I don't view signatures. I see that as common sense because I don't have to scroll past lame quotes from people like you.
And I don't view signatures. I see that as common sense because I don't have to scroll past lame quotes from people like you.
berry580
Member
Well in case you want to deny anything. I'll make myself clear.jhakka said:No. I just think its lame.
And I don't view signatures. I see that as common sense because I don't have to scroll past lame quotes from people like you.
The part where I'm refering to is- "If what is said offends you, then that is probably the truth."
In other words, I want to say you possibly have a FAT @SS (and maybe spare types too).
"If what is said offends you, then that is probably the truth" is pretty lame. Some people simply have morals. It doesn't mean what you said explicitly applies to them. In this case, suggesting jhakka possibly has a fat ass simply because he objects to your anti-fat attitude is nothing short of preposterous.
azzie
so delicious...
im 62 kg/5"11..... does that make me fat in ur books berry?
berry580
Member
WTF?!!JKDDragon said:
That's a guy? OMG, don't tell me you like tanks (ignore me if you're truly obese, and sorry if it offends anyone).
azzie
so delicious...
they dont make men as tall as they used to
or maybe ur right jkddragon and im just much too excessivley tall
or maybe ur right jkddragon and im just much too excessivley tall
berry580
Member
Of course not.azzie said:
Like I said, about 60kg but it may vary to your height accordingly.
If any cutey wants to see if you're within my range. Find your weight (kg) and height (metre), and divide your weight by the square of your height. e.g If 1.7m tall and 60kg
60/(1.7^2)= 20.76
If the answer is between 20-25, you're well within my standard. If you're answer is over 30, then 'f' off. <--- joking
Although I can be friends with fat people, but an overweight girl can never by my girlfriend of wife.
"<---" <--- for dummies
So in other words, azzie, can I buy you a drink (low fat)? hahaha
berry580
Member
Also, by my height's requirement standard, my potential girlfriend can vary from 58kg-72kg.
S
Shuter
Guest
Holy crap, so am I... but I'm a guy. Slightly taller actually and a touch lighter.azzie said:
See it's not about how much you weigh but just your general appearance i.e. healthy
berry580
Member
WTF?!!Shuter said:
You're 180cm but 60kg?!! WOOT!!?
You know you're really underweight. (Try that weight index calculation I provided, and the ideal score is 20-25) Although I'm almost too- scoring 20.7
Well I know that, but in general, if you're overweight, you probably won't look too good either.
Ok shuter, you can delete this account now.....