supermike
Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
- Messages
- 55
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- N/A
hey when i study 2u geometry, i come across 2 theorems i dont quite know how to apply to my arguments
are "midpoint theorem" and "intercept theorem" enough as REASONS? or should i write full sentence to explain my point??
for instance, should i write "The segment joining the midpoints of two sides of a triangle is parallel to the third side and half as long as the third side" instead of "midpoint theorem" and "the ratios of any 2 segments on the first line equals the ratios of the according segments on the second line" instead of "intercept theorem" as REASONS????
HELP!!!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!!!!
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
are "midpoint theorem" and "intercept theorem" enough as REASONS? or should i write full sentence to explain my point??
for instance, should i write "The segment joining the midpoints of two sides of a triangle is parallel to the third side and half as long as the third side" instead of "midpoint theorem" and "the ratios of any 2 segments on the first line equals the ratios of the according segments on the second line" instead of "intercept theorem" as REASONS????
HELP!!!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!!!!
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl: