Lolsmith
kill all boomers
nor were they refugees you idiot
Do you REALLY think anti-immigration people are fine with Muslim immigrants?yeah I guess white refugees don't cause any problems. oh wait boston bombers.
You haven't been keeping up with the news lately have you?nor were they refugees you idiot
IQ is an extremely strong predictor of socio-economic outcomes, such as income (and by proxy productivity), academic achievement, criminality, marriage stability etc. And it also correlates negatively with time preference, which itself has enormous predictive power.Ok firstly stop using IQ as a vaild measurement for anything ever.
And how did you find out your IQ?The only people who care about their IQ are people who get around 120-140 so they have something to brag about. I know because I used to do this with my IQ of 136.
"did some reading" i.e. read some crap by a butthurt liberal who can't possibly conceive of socio-economic differences caused by anything other greedy corporations and "discrimination"Then I did some reading and found out it's bullshit.
Well you're being a fucking moron, because Ashkenazi jews, koreans, japanese, Hong Kongers et al. ALL do better than whites. Whilst still living in non-white countries. On a test developed by whites!Silly test designed to measure how white and middle class you are. Why did I do so well? because I'm white and middle class
Well now you're starting to make sense.Also on the Tamil issue, why can't they just go to India where all the other Tamils are? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamil_diaspora
Also referring back to the OP. Are you insane? 40 million people? the current population is unsustainable never mind another 20 million
I was literally responding to claims by the OP et al they they would be economically beneficial to Australia.Sylvia: you're obviously confusing the difference between refugees and immigrants. Of course refugees don't have any "skills" to help our economy, they had to flee their homes mostly due to either civil war or genocide.
Oh noes, not UN commitments!Yeah lets just break all our UN commitments and Australian refugee law. GG.
Have you taken the SAT's before? The only reason why asians score so high is pretty much weighted on the math section. since language is huge part of the SAT's, if you didn't grow up in a family that were white collared tertiary educated, you're pretty much screwed on the verbal and written section.For years, the SAT has come under attack for having a certain bent. From the Harvard Educational Review to the Princeton Review, the measurement tool has been called a "white preference test."
1. Racial gaps haven't closed in the past few decades. No really, those who advocate "equality" acknowledge this themselves, which is why they say more needs to be done to combat it.Thanks for using a 20 year old statistic to tell us how dumb mexicans and blacks are. Yeah SAT scores are real accurate on how well a racial group does.
SAT are indicative of academic performance and IQ? you obviously have never taken the test nor know anything about it. SAT's are extremely biased towards people who have money. It's practically a test you can pour money into to score higher.1. Racial gaps haven't closed in the past few decades. No really, those who advocate "equality" acknowledge this themselves, which is why they say more needs to be done to combat it.
2. My point wasn't to say how dumb they are, I'm highlighting that the racial gaps aren't related to income levels.
3. Yes SAT scores are a relatively good measure of academic performance and an indicator of IQ.
IDIOT, I just showed that rich black kids do worse than poor white kids.SAT are indicative of academic performance and IQ? you obviously have never taken the test nor know anything about it. SAT's are extremely biased towards people who have money. It's practically a test you can pour money into to score higher.
http://www.studypoint.com/ed/average-sat-scores/
You really have no idea how the SAT creates a racial bias do you?IDIOT, I just showed that rich black kids do worse than poor white kids.
Want to prove it?You really have no idea how the SAT creates a racial bias do you?
BUT THE RICH BLACKS WENT WORSE THAN THE POOR WHITES, so there is necessarily more to it than moneyYour graph pretty much proved more money = high score on the SAT. Nothing to do with intelligence at all.
Except they didn't even come close to scoring 250 points higher than the national average.Omg those kids in kentucky and Illinois, minnesota, michigan, colorado must be super duper smart! Scoring almost a full 250 points higher than the US national average!
.
Yeah based on a 20 year old stat rich blacks 20 years ago did worst than poor whites. no racial bias in the test at all amirite. I guess those guys are harvard and princeton are just full of shit. well maybe you haven't seen how abysmal the education system in predominantly black areas are have you? maybe that might have an effect on schooling? but still, good job on using a 20 year old stat about "education" when the SAT's aren't even a mandatory test. But still, good job on using an outdated statistic to prove your point how dumb black people are.Want to prove it?
BUT THE RICH BLACKS WENT WORSE THAN THE POOR WHITES, so there is necessarily more to it than money
and again, chinese people have higher IQs despite being poorer.
Total score. That's adding up math, critical reading and writing. national average is 1500, average for those states are well in the 1700+ range.Except they didn't even come close to scoring 250 points higher than the national average.
Racial bias in favour of asians, apparently.no racial bias in the test at all amirite.
BUH-BUHHHHHI guess those guys are harvard and princeton are just full of shit. well maybe you haven't seen how abysmal the education system in predominantly black areas are have you?
It doesn't matter that its 20 years old, the gaps are still essentially the same. But are you trying to say that 20 years ago income didn't matter that much but nowadays it suddenly does?but still, good job on using a 20 year old stat
Okay, can you point to any kind of test in which significant racial gaps aren't present?about "education" when the SAT's aren't even a mandatory test.
IDIOT, I'm saying that low IQs aren't caused by not being rich.But still, good job on using an outdated statistic to prove your point how dumb black people are.