scuba_steve2121
On The Road To Serfdom
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2009
- Messages
- 1,343
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- N/A
Ten bucks says the people who took an IQ test and did well came from high SES families.IQ is an extremely strong predictor of socio-economic outcomes, such as income (and by proxy productivity), academic achievement, criminality, marriage stability etc. And it also correlates negatively with time preference, which itself has enormous predictive power.
And how did you find out your IQ?
"did some reading" i.e. read some crap by a butthurt liberal who can't possibly conceive of socio-economic differences caused by anything other greedy corporations and "discrimination"
Well you're being a fucking moron, because Ashkenazi jews, koreans, japanese, Hong Kongers et al. ALL do better than whites. Whilst still living in non-white countries. On a test developed by whites!
Also: SATs correlate strongly with IQs, so if we use SAT scores as a proxy for IQ we can see that racial difference have little to do with income, because non-asian minorites score lower than whites for all income levels. Rich black kids score worse than poor white kids.
Well now you're starting to make sense.
Before this goes any further I don't believe that one test can test a person's intelligence, since there isn't even a consensus on what being intelligent means.
For some reason the primary school thought it would be a good idea for me to take an IQ test because they thought I was either gifted or Insane, turned out to be latter
The reading I did was part of a couple of Psych units I had to do for my BE
Also your graph is meaningless as it doesn't address the Socio in Socio-Economic, which is just as important in determining the grades a student will get. They're are plenty of rich plumbers in Western Sydney, who don't encourage their kids to do well in school because their too busy down at the pub.
Last edited: