K
katie_tully
Guest
Re: Rudd to say Sorry on February 12
I asked since when did an apology = compensation.
I then said I don't think there is anything for us to apologise for. I certainly don't remember saying
- We didn't do anything wrong. (Well I said that, but I didn't say the next bit)
- We'll have to pay compensation
What it comes down to is fuck off your argument is that of every other bleeding heart idiot.
Oh you disagree with an apology? You must hate Aboriginals!
Dumbasses.
Dude, read it again you fuckstain.Optophobia said:on a macro-scale when damage has been done, then money is necessary, and whether people want to pay compensation is irrelevant - magistrates don't only order people to pay for damage to other peoples cars if the defendant wants to pay for the damage.
In which case you shouldn't be concerned about monetary compensation. Because if we are not liable and we have done nothing wrong, then no court would award damages?
You are a living paradox.
- We didn't do anything wrong. (Well I said that, but I didn't say the next bit)
- We'll have to pay compensation.
What it comes down to is an imagined racial superiority struggle in your mind, which in effect causes you to pivot around the issue. You grapple with it in a way that allows you to retain blindness on the issue. You retain blindness because you feel that something of yours is at stake.
Abuse against migrants and aborigines has always happened. It continues to this very day!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_tradition
Oh, but I have learned about logical fallacies seeing as you seem insistant on shoving them in my face 10 times every time i make a reply - even in response to arguments which are not strictly fallacious. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
They didn't steal their children to achieve that purpose (or make an attempt thereof).
You chose to attack me (and the reconciliation FAQ) rather than the argument posed. Hence you employed an ad hominem attack. It was YOU who engaged in hyperbole, not I.
OmgZ! The romans invaded other peoplez lands aboriginiez should just shut up and stop complaing ?!!@!@?@?!@
Fuck off.
DerRRRRrrr what this guy says make sense but i disagree with it because i imagine myself to have a vested interest in shooting down what he's saying because i'm a dumb cunt. derrr.. straw man fallacy. derrrrrr.
It is a rock solid source, and you have no main criticism other than to invoke a racist rejection of the story line as being "unreliable".
Because you, like the Liberal party, are heavy manipulators. You like to play word games (semantics) and avoid the issue at hand.
Derrr.. ad hominem derrr.
I asked since when did an apology = compensation.
I then said I don't think there is anything for us to apologise for. I certainly don't remember saying
- We didn't do anything wrong. (Well I said that, but I didn't say the next bit)
- We'll have to pay compensation
What it comes down to is fuck off your argument is that of every other bleeding heart idiot.
Oh you disagree with an apology? You must hate Aboriginals!
Dumbasses.