kawaiipotato
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2015
- Messages
- 463
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2015
Oh sorry thx for not putting (2-b, a) inFYI I wrote that question lol
Oh sorry thx for not putting (2-b, a) inFYI I wrote that question lol
Im calling the child abuse hotline...FYI I wrote that question lol
How were we supposed to figure out there are asymptotes on the axes?How was the graph question in question 12?
inb4 69%Oh and also, to let everyone's expectations of me down, im not getting above 70. I counted my losses and it's not happening.
Are both u and ekman azns? Some reason i thought u guys were arab lolFor those who don't know what vanoss looks like :
Me and ekman made a bet that if either of us gets above 70 were coming to next years BOS trials and streaking.inb4 69%
Wow just coz i have a beard im arab ? Im neither asian nor am i Arab.Are both u and ekman azns? Some reason i thought u guys were arab lol
Are both u and ekman azns? Some reason i thought u guys were arab lol
I am asian, drsoccerball can confirm this.Wow just coz i have a beard im arab ? Im neither asian nor am i Arab.
How were we supposed to figure out there are asymptotes on the axes?
As well as that, there is no critical point at (1,1). Wolfram Alpha says so. The critical point is (-1,-1)
Technically this is true... for both of usI am asian, drsoccerball can confirm this.
YESSSSS BUDDDDYYYYY I can now get 26% rather than 25
How were we supposed to figure out there are asymptotes on the axes?
On Wolfram, the graph looks like it intercepts the y-axis and x-axis. I did what you did, but wolfram graphed something weird.
Somehow LaTeX doesn't seem to be working now if using $'s for symbolic expressions, even though it always has before. Test:
Thank goodness