Kittycat
Member
Well, ROTK was a good movie but half way through it I wanted to stab PJ to death for what he has done.Originally posted by glycerine
RotK was NOT the best picture by any means.
Like I said, ROTK is a good movie but I hate some of the changes that PJ has added. As much as I love LOTR, I kinda wanted Peter Weir to win est director.Originally posted by jim_green
Ok I probably overreacted a bit before, sorry. Still, it would be ironic if Peter Jackson were to get attacked by midgets. I guess if LOTR had any reason for winning it, it is in recognition of the vasts amount of effort that must have gone into it, which if fair enough.
Anyway I agree with Trigger mostly except about Master and Commander, which I felt was a far superior epic as a single movie than ROTK. Seabiscuit though was an above average movie that was really there more because of the story's cultural significance to American history. It was a decent movie as well, but probably not Oscar worthy.
So IMO 3 nominated movies were ROTK's superior. It's true that there will be plenty of Oscars for good drama in the future, but I'm just a little ticked that the Academy decided to save its recognition for LOTR in such a great year for movies. Would've been much more logical to recognise it in 2001 when the winner was 'A Beautiful Mind', another one of those Seabiscuit level movies, or last year when it was 'Chicago'.
I was kinda ticked that there is so much great movies this year that some great talents unfortunately weren't recognised this time but 1 thing I have to disagree with you is that the other 3 nomination is better than ROTK. I think it is mainly between ROTK & Master + Commander.