The original equation you provided was not divisible by (x-1) as the Remainder theorem suggested. When we actually divided the original equation by (x-1), we learnt that there was a remainder of -7. Therefore, if you wish to make this divisible, you had to add 7 to the original equation.Fortian09 said:whats the reason though?
The question asked you to make it divisible. Look at my answer in purple pen on the previous page (unless it was too small). =\Fortian09 said:whats the reason though?
Wow, what is that meant to ask?Fortian09 said:More questions
What property is common to all equations of the form
x 3 + mx + k = 0?
It's x^3, not x^2.lyounamu said:Wow, what is that meant to ask?
All I can say is that its discriminant = m^2 - 4k
I'll take a stab and say the sum of roots equals zero lol.Fortian09 said:More questions
What property is common to all equations of the form
x 3 + mx + k = 0?
I am blind.tommykins said:It's x^3, not x^2.
Correct.independantz said:I'll take a stab and say the sum of roots equals zero lol.
yeah it should be. Also the product of the roots = -k.Fortian09 said:So the sum of roots is the correct answer?
Would saying the co-efficient of the x2 being 0 be correct?Fortian09 said:More questions
What property is common to all equations of the form
x 3 + mx + k = 0?
Interestingly, you can convert any cubic polynomial into the depressed form y^3+A^y=B by making the substitution x=y-b/(3a) in ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0. Indeed, this is how the cubic formula was found.bored of sc said:Would saying the co-efficient of the x2 being 0 be correct?
Wow.Slidey said:Interestingly, you can convert any cubic polynomial into the depressed form y^3+A^y=B by making the substitution x=y-b/(3a) in ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0. Indeed, this is how the cubic formula was found.
conics2008 said:In AT Progression Series let alpha = a beta = a + d gamma = a +2d and so on.
id use a-d, a and a+d, itd work out nicer for the sum of the roots