P
pLuvia
Guest
who agrees this game is good/??
I haven't played Medieval: Total War, but from what I've heard R:TW defiantly an improvement over it, and an expansion pack is planned. What I like about it so much is that it’s essential two different games; A Civilisation like Empire builder, and a RTS like combat-sim.psychosuperfly said:I've been playing Medieval:Total war recently and found that i enjoyed it to a point. The game is awesome however i must say that i am getting quite bored with the few options i have. I really enjoy strategy games however as the game progresses no new options open up and i am left wondering if i should finish or just go study (ahaha that'll be the day) anyway i am tossing up between two options at the moment rather than leech off poor friends like usual. I'm going to buy a game soon and it's either going to be Rome:total war or Black & White 2. in your opinion do you think Rome is a huge step above it's predecesor? are many new option available than divide and conquer?
exactly .. i dont know how to use em .. they have shit economy and shit warriors ..kadlil said:hahaha nar parthia are ok if you know how to use them correctly..
The problem with that tactic is it often leads to riots and general discontent, which leads to civil revolts, so you end up back where you started. If you siege the city, and take it over via force you have the option of executing most the population, which helps keep down civil unrest.hipPo3 said:exactly .. i dont know how to use em .. they have shit economy and shit warriors ..
i had to try and buy out cities instead of fighting them .. was the only way i could stay alive.
I'm sure a flaming one-tonne boulder slammed on their heads kills one or two.Demandred said:Bloody barbarians, takes 10x harder to kill now.
personnally i find using the Romans is a form of a cheat .. the first time i played i picked house of Brutii and fully owned Rome .. i destroyed Scipii and Julli easily even though Scippi conqured practiacally all of Libya and some parts of EgyptGötterfunken said:The problem with that tactic is it often leads to riots and general discontent, which leads to civil revolts, so you end up back where you started. If you siege the city, and take it over via force you have the option of executing most the population, which helps keep down civil unrest.
I think one of the easiest faction is the Brutii, they are in a great position to make lots of money through trade, even though they have to fight against Macedonia and the Greek cities, which use their infernal phalanxes against you. Whatever faction you pick, try and get as many port cities as possible, and try extra hard to capture Carthage. It has the potential to be a very useful city.
In any case it depends on what type of general you are—i.e. what types of troops you like to use. I strongly prefer infantry, and have honed my tactics, such as they are, to their use. As a result my armies only often have a token cavalry (mostly for counter flanking operations and some clean up towards the end of the battle), and archer contingent. Your preference into unit types will also direct what faction you pick, obviously.
I ‘acquired’ the new expansion pack, Barbarian Invasion, and I don’t like it much. The presence of Christians (and without the option to feed them to lions in the Colosseum) and Christianity, in the ten minutes I’ve played it, makes religion more difficult, as to the barbarian ‘hordes’ which are essential huge mobile armies that make up a whole civilisation; their goal is usually to take over your cities and make it their new home. Plus I’ve never been a big fan of the concept of West and East Roman Empires, but that’s another story.