S1/17 WAM Predictions (1 Viewer)

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Lol didnt realise that you could only get a whole number
I'm not sure how it works at MQ, but at UNSW whole number marks is the norm and an effort will be made to round marks up where necessary. This may be different at MQ due to the use of the GPA and a focus on whether or not you got HDs/DNs/CRs instead of a number, but you should keep this into consideration when judging WAMs.
 

Randox

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
356
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Ok guys would love some help here. Old wam was 73.958 with 24 subjects counted. New wam is (using wam glitch) 73.462. Anyone know how many subjects have been added from this semester for me so far?
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Ok guys would love some help here. Old wam was 73.958 with 24 subjects counted. New wam is (using wam glitch) 73.462. Anyone know how many subjects have been added from this semester for me so far?
I will make the assumptions that all subject marks are whole numbers and all subjects are equally weighted. (If these assumptions don't both hold, you would have to provide us with what assumptions to use I suppose.)

The fractional part of the new Average is 0.462 (at least to three decimal places). This implies the total no. of subjects N (which is at least 25) cannot be 25, since the possible fractional parts then are precisely of the form k/25 (k an integer from 0 to 24), which would make the fractional part be a multiple of 1/25 = 0.04, and hence have a third decimal place of 0.

Note that 12/26 = 0.46153..., which is 0.462 to three decimal places, so 26 is a candidate for the total no. of possible subjects used.

Play around with your calculator on other numbers like 27 and 28 and see what the fractional parts around 0.4 are like for those numbers (so numbers of the form k/27 or k/28 that just less than 14/27 or 14/28), and see if any are 0.462 to three decimal places. If none are, 26 is probably the total no. of subjects used in the new Average.
 

Queenroot

I complete the Squar3
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Messages
7,507
Location
My bathtub
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
y'all just wait until results come out

if u put this much effort into studyin y'all wouldn't have to worry about analysing ur damn WAM
 

BenHowe

Active Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2015
Messages
354
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Uni Grad
2020
The total of n integers will have a remainder of either 0, 1, 2, 3, …, or (n-1) upon division by n. This implies that the possible fractional parts for the average of n whole numbers are just: 0, 1/n, 2/n, 3/n, …, (n-1)/n.

E.g. If 1 subject: only can have decimal of 0.

If 2 subjects: only can have decimal of 0 or 0.5 (i.e. 0 or 1/2).

If 3 subjects: only can have decimal of 0, 0.333..., or 0.666..., (i.e., 0, 1/3, or 2/3).

If 4 subjects: only can have decimal of 0, 0.25, 0.5, or 0.75 (i.e. 0, 1/4, 2/4, or 3/4).

Etc.

Furthermore, if 0 < f < 1 and the smallest positive integer for which f occurs as a possible fractional part in the average is n0, then f can occur as a fractional part in the average of N subjects (N a positive integer) if and only if N is a (positive) multiple of n0 (easy exercise).

So for instance, a fractional part of 0.25 in the average means the no. of subjects used in the average must have been some multiple of 4, since 4 is the smallest positive integer for which 0.25 can occur as a fractional part.

(Assumptions: weights in the average are equal and subject marks are whole numbers. If one or more of these assumptions is violated, then other decimal values may be possible.)
Lol I think only people on BOS would have debate over this lol
 

Randox

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
356
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I will make the assumptions that all subject marks are whole numbers and all subjects are equally weighted. (If these assumptions don't both hold, you would have to provide us with what assumptions to use I suppose.)

The fractional part of the new Average is 0.462 (at least to three decimal places). This implies the total no. of subjects N (which is at least 25) cannot be 25, since the possible fractional parts then are precisely of the form k/25 (k an integer from 0 to 24), which would make the fractional part be a multiple of 1/25 = 0.04, and hence have a third decimal place of 0.

Note that 12/26 = 0.46153..., which is 0.462 to three decimal places, so 26 is a candidate for the total no. of possible subjects used.

Play around with your calculator on other numbers like 27 and 28 and see what the fractional parts around 0.4 are like for those numbers (so numbers of the form k/27 or k/28 that just less than 14/27 or 14/28), and see if any are 0.462 to three decimal places. If none are, 26 is probably the total no. of subjects used in the new Average.
Thanks for this. I think it's 26. So 2 counted
 

eating

Wannabe COMP god
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
109
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2016
y'all just wait until results come out

if u put this much effort into studyin y'all wouldn't have to worry about analysing ur damn WAM
I study my WAM so that I can get a better WAM.
 

Esse

xD
Joined
May 9, 2016
Messages
265
Location
Sanctuary Hotel
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I have a number now. I did ENGG1000, ENGG1811, PHYS1121, MATH1131. Not sure which

Edit: I am 90% sure it's ENGG1811
 
Last edited:

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
MATH is currently being logged in now I believe
 

DatAtarLyfe

Booty Connoisseur
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
1,805
Gender
Female
HSC
2016
Keep us updated

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

RenegadeMx

Kosovo is Serbian
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
1,310
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Uni Grad
2016
holy fuck he must have scaled hard if i got HD in foundations of calc LOL
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top