relevant, not only for your HSC, but for university assignments:
for reference, UNSW policy on plagiarism:Vague rules let off HSC cheats - ICAC
TAKE-HOME assignments for HSC students are open to corruption and schools need more help to prevent cheating, the corruption watchdog has warned after an investigation into a tutoring college.
The review by the Independent Commission Against Corruption found that the Board of Studies' definition of a student's "own work" was so arbitrary that students were confused about what constituted plagiarism. It also called on the NSW Government to consider regulating the tutoring industry.
Students suspected of cheating should be required to prove the work was their own and the board should set up a register of misconduct cases and publicise the results, the commission recommended in its report, tabled in Parliament yesterday.
The guidelines on what constituted a student's own work were so inconsistent that the commission was unable to prove the college at the centre of the investigation, Acclaim Education, had violated any cheating policies.
This was despite proof that Acclaim tutors had rewritten parts of students' English assessments and provided them with drafts.
The commission found the college's manager, Rachel Gardener, had made changes to a student's essay the day before it was due. At the end of the document she wrote: "This took me nearly five hours. I fixed before I cut."
The student received 48 out of 50 for her English Extension 2 major work, the commission said.
Ms Gardener had also advised students not to tell their teachers that they were employing external tutors because it could prejudice them. She recommended that if they were confronted, to burst into tears and contact their parents, the commission's investigators were told.
Three-quarters of schools who responded to a survey by the commission reported that they felt inadequately supported by the Board of Studies in situations where they suspected cheating.
One parent, told that his son had cheated in a Business Studies assessment, accused the school of racism. When confronted with proof, "the father pulled out a large bundle of $100 notes and commenced flicking through the notes until he reached a business card that he gave to the teachers," the report said.
The NSW Minister for Education, Carmel Tebbutt, said the board had already changed its procedures since it conducted its own review into the Acclaim case, including a compulsory ethics program and tougher declaration forms for HSC students to fill out on assessments.
The board and the Education Department would consider how to act on the latest recommendations, Ms Tebbutt said.
Mohan Dhall, of the Australian Tutoring Association, a voluntary body with its own code of conduct, said he would be happy to work with the Board of Studies, but more regulation was unnecessary.
Ms Gardener could not be contacted yesterday.
What is Plagiarism?
Plagiarism is the presentation of the thoughts or work of another as one’s own.
Examples include:
• direct duplication of the thoughts or work of another, including by copying material, ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document (whether published or unpublished), composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or software, web site, Internet, other electronic resource, or another person’s assignment without appropriate acknowledgement;
• paraphrasing another person’s work with very minor changes keeping the meaning, form and/or progression of ideas of the original;
• piecing together sections of the work of others into a new whole;
• presenting an assessment item as independent work when it has been produced in whole or part in collusion with other people, for example, another student or a tutor; and
• claiming credit for a proportion a work contributed to a group assessment item that is greater than that actually contributed.
For the purposes of this policy, submitting an assessment item that has already been submitted for academic credit elsewhere may be considered plagiarism.
Knowingly permitting your work to be copied by another student may also be
considered to be plagiarism.
Note that an assessment item produced in oral, not written, form, or involving live
presentation, may similarly contain plagiarised material.
The inclusion of the thoughts or work of another with attribution appropriate to the academic discipline does not amount to plagiarism.