slowjam10
Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 249
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2008
Hey
I was wondering if anyone finds that teachers are not justifed with their marking?
For example, this happens to my friend and I quite often, a teacher awards a mark and writes it on the exam paper or whatnot and then crosses it out and gives it a lower mark.
This has happened to me quite a few times especially, in subjects like Legal and Ancient. Usually I approach the teacher and asks them which mark it is, because they have a tendency to write the new mark over the old one. More often than not, the response is the lower mark. Anyway, then when i ask for some feedback, they can't substantiate or justify their marking.
For example, in Legal i got 23/25 for my crime extended response, although the original mark was higher. The teacher's response to my question was that he marked me harder than other students in the class because I am currently ranked first and he felt that it's good to mark me harder in order to give me something to aim for. He also said the cliched phrase 'There's always room for improvement' and while i know this is true, why do teachers feel the need to dock someone of a few marks to give them that room.
Do you think this is right?
I am sick of teachers taking off marks just to give me something to aim for. I mean if you deserve 100%, then you should get it. i think teachers take the view that if they give you 100, then you will slacken off. But for me, even if i get 100, it doesn't make me feel like i should slacken off, quite the opposite actually. It's more like - hmm, how can I attain that next time.
Another example, is in my Ancient Half Yearly. I received 99% and when the teacher gave back the exam, she said she couldn't fault it in any way possible and said she had to go through it with a fine tooth comb to find something, even thought there was no justification as to what she exactly found.
So in short, do you think it is right to be docked marks, when you have in fact achieved them?
I was wondering if anyone finds that teachers are not justifed with their marking?
For example, this happens to my friend and I quite often, a teacher awards a mark and writes it on the exam paper or whatnot and then crosses it out and gives it a lower mark.
This has happened to me quite a few times especially, in subjects like Legal and Ancient. Usually I approach the teacher and asks them which mark it is, because they have a tendency to write the new mark over the old one. More often than not, the response is the lower mark. Anyway, then when i ask for some feedback, they can't substantiate or justify their marking.
For example, in Legal i got 23/25 for my crime extended response, although the original mark was higher. The teacher's response to my question was that he marked me harder than other students in the class because I am currently ranked first and he felt that it's good to mark me harder in order to give me something to aim for. He also said the cliched phrase 'There's always room for improvement' and while i know this is true, why do teachers feel the need to dock someone of a few marks to give them that room.
Do you think this is right?
I am sick of teachers taking off marks just to give me something to aim for. I mean if you deserve 100%, then you should get it. i think teachers take the view that if they give you 100, then you will slacken off. But for me, even if i get 100, it doesn't make me feel like i should slacken off, quite the opposite actually. It's more like - hmm, how can I attain that next time.
Another example, is in my Ancient Half Yearly. I received 99% and when the teacher gave back the exam, she said she couldn't fault it in any way possible and said she had to go through it with a fine tooth comb to find something, even thought there was no justification as to what she exactly found.
So in short, do you think it is right to be docked marks, when you have in fact achieved them?