Split-brain patients and theology (1 Viewer)

Enteebee

Keepers of the flames
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Messages
3,091
Location
/
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Dan said:
Actually that's fairly straightforward; if they're two independent consciousnesses and we take a literal interpretation of christianity the unbeliever consciousness will go to hell and the belee ver will go to heaven! PRAISE BE TO GOD
So we can by manipulating the brain split one soul in two or does one soul die and we create two others? It appears to be quite a problem for anyone who believes in a soul...
 

Admiral Nelson

Generalfeldmarschall
Joined
Jun 19, 2007
Messages
132
Location
The Shire
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
This is one of the few times I'm actually wishing I had a theologian to converse with.
 

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
I'm having a lazy arvo so I'm going to repost something I put up in the abortion debate thread -

Technical issues regarding souls:

- As Kwayera mentioned (in the abortion thread), identical twins start off as a single zygote. Do two seperate souls simply occupy the one zygote at once? Does a single soul split into two? Does a second soul simply appear at the time of spliting?

- Split brain cases are troublesome for those arguing for a unitary immaterial mind/soul. In many documented cases the seperate hemispheres, after having the corpus collosum severed, exhibit contrary goals and aims, e.g. the right hand will try to pick a blue shirt out of the wardrobe while the left hand picks a green shirt, or one hand does up a zipper while the other hand undoes it. In other words the hemispheres seem to lack unity, as though there are now two persons coinhabiting one body. I am unsure how this phenomenon can be explained with recourse to 'the soul'.

- Neurological syndromes due to focal damage are also problematic. E.g. it is possible to loose colour vision, or the ability to recognise faces, or the ability to acknowledge the 'left side of the world', or one's social inhibitions. Note, then, that physical lesions can create major deficits in a person's experienced world. Essentially, all the things which seem to make a person a person, e.g. memories, beliefs, capacity for reason, temperament, moral conscience and so forth, seem to be susceptible to erasure by means of physical damage. Thus any theory of the soul which views such human capacities as dependent on the soul needs to be able to explain how such physical lesions can entirely interupt these supposedly 'immaterial' capacities.
 

Snaykew

:)
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
538
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
:eek:

Imagine the two consciousnesses specialising in two different things. :D They can switch between each other to treat patients.

I wonder if the two sides can communicate with each other within themselves?
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Fucking epic thread. I love you guys.

I'm waiting, Inasero!
 

Enteebee

Keepers of the flames
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Messages
3,091
Location
/
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Miles Edgeworth said:
This thread has caused me to do hell of reading instead of Uni work but this is trés intriguing. Woo consciousness, agency etc. discussions.
was it you that'd read "freedom evolves" ? :eek:
 

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
P.S. Ramachandran is super cool. Anyone interested in hearing him at length should check out the 2003 BBC Reith Lecture series that he did:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2003/

In particular I found lecture 4 on the connections between neuroscience and aesthetics to be quite interesting.
 
Joined
Jun 19, 2008
Messages
107
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
This is obviously a conspiracy theory which I will prove to be incorrect very shortly.

PS You are all noobs LOL.
 

Enteebee

Keepers of the flames
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Messages
3,091
Location
/
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
mythical chaos said:
This is obviously a conspiracy theory which I will prove to be incorrect very shortly.

PS You are all noobs LOL.
Noobs? :eek:

I've read ramachandran's books for about 4 years now I just hadn't really come accross the implications of split-brain patients for dualists.
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Since human cloning is possible, whose soul would it be? Cloning happens naturally, too, so if the soul of the 'hosts' genetic material is diminished, that implies twins have less of a soul, too.

But likewise, if twins have full, distinct souls each, then that implies a human-created clone would also have a full, distinct soul, no? So humans are able to create new souls?
 

stazi

Nightman
Joined
Feb 23, 2003
Messages
14,093
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
since i cant watch the video at work: could someone explain in easy to understand english what the implications are? what is the significance of split-brain patients.
 

katie tully

ashleey luvs roosters
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Messages
5,213
Location
My wrist is limp
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Slidey said:
Since human cloning is possible, whose soul would it be? Cloning happens naturally, too, so if the soul of the 'hosts' genetic material is diminished, that implies twins have less of a soul, too.

But likewise, if twins have full, distinct souls each, then that implies a human-created clone would also have a full, distinct soul, no? So humans are able to create new souls?
But what is a soul?
 

P_Dilemma

Extraordinary Entertainer
Joined
Oct 18, 2004
Messages
752
Location
The Void
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
So if u split ur brain, at least half of you gets to go to heaven... i like the odds
 

darkliight

I ponder, weak and weary
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
341
Location
Central Coast, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Ok .. but what if both halves are atheists? Does that mean they get double the suffering in the afterlife?
 

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Cyan_phoeniX said:
Firstly, don't get the idea that the hemispheres are physically separate just because of the lack of a CC. It is rare for a corpus callosum to be completely severed (often only a portion of it is removed in surgery), meaning some information can still travel across the two hemispheres by this pathway. Also, the corpus callosum isn't the only fibre to cross the hemispheres - there is the anterior and posterior commissure and (for a number of females and some males), the masa intermedia of the thalamus (which is a powerhouse for a shitload of information processing). They may call people without a CC 'split-brain' but that isn't entirely true - the two hemispheres can (and do) still communicate with each other by other means.
Fair call, but your objection depends, in part, on the number of important corticocortical fibres running through the ant./post. commisures and the massa intermedia respectively. I haven't studied the massa intermedia, but if it only allows crossing of spinocortical or corticospinal fibres then it isn't much of a counter-example since in the first instance (bottom-up) it is like a case of shared information (two different people, but with extremely similar sensory input) and in the second (top-down) it is like a case of shared control (think two different people with joysticks controlling the same videogame). The sparing of the anterior commisure is a more relevant objection, especially given temporal lobe and amygdala connections (it would be interesting to see fMRI studies in split-brain patients looking for bilateral amygdala stimulation in response to anxiety stimuli).

However, I would still contend that you would still loose cross-hemispheric integration of a lot of the core processes that help constitute that amorphous entity we call 'the self'. Think, in particular, capacities like reasoning, executive control, moral decision making and emotional regulation. Granted, the amygdala is important in emotional regulation and moral reasoning is quite broadly distributed, but I think it is still an important point that connections between key, relevant processing centres are obliterated in split-brain patients.

There is a potentially very interesting thought experiment here where you slowly decrease the integration of information between the two hemispheres to the point where they are entirely independent. At what point is one self split into two? The mere possibility of such a thought experiment seems to create issues for the notion of a self as a categorical entity - it is interesting to ask what becomes of the self (or the soul!) if it instead exists on a spectrum.
 

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
A relevant bit of recent literature - Uddin et al (2008) Residual functional connectivity in the split-brain revealed with resting-state functional MRI. Neuroreport

The abstract reads [alas, I lack journal access]:
Split-brain patients present a unique opportunity to address controversies regarding subcortical contributions to interhemispheric coordination. We characterized residual functional connectivity in a complete commissurotomy patient by examining patterns of low-frequency BOLD functional MRI signal. Using independent components analysis and region-of-interest-based functional connectivity analyses, we demonstrate bilateral resting state networks in a patient lacking all major cerebral commissures. Compared with a control group, the patient's interhemispheric correlation scores fell within the normal range for two out of three regions examined. Thus, we provide evidence for bilateral resting state networks in a patient with complete commissurotomy. Such continued interhemispheric interaction suggests that, at least in part, cortical networks in the brain can be coordinated by subcortical mechanisms.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top