Willobee said:
i love history and especially extension history. studying post modernism at the moment which i find fascinating but it's made me question why thousands of us teenagers go through this cruel form of what can only be considered some sought of a cruel initiation rite of passage. the most intelligent students dont always get the best UAI anyway. i love history english and drama but apparently someone that loves chemistry maths and biology is smarter than me. i admit i couldn't cope with chemistry but i know plenty of chemistry students that couldn't do half of what i do in drama. its all making me very cynical is there anyone out there that feels the same?
I don't really understand your question.
And I feel stupid but i'll answer anyway.
Are you questioning postmodernism or are you questioning the values of sciencey subjects vs the arts?
I'm an arts student too, i'm not doing drama, i'm doing visual art, history extension, 4 unit english and religion. I love these subjects, and it isnt true that chemistry and maths and biology are smarter than you. Only if that person studying them is studying them harder than you.
What you should take into account though is that you cannot compare the arts with the sciences.
That science/maths are objective subjects, whilst drama is very subjective and hence why in some cases it must feel like you're not performing as well. (oh puns are the death of me)
I guess since i've realised this I don't feel the same way as you do. But I think that you don't have to feel cynical about doing these subjects because if you aim for great marks, study hard and do every assessment and exam to the best of your ability you'll perform just as well as those biology and chemistry students?
Meh I don't think I answered this particularly well but I'm up for a discussion.