• We have a few events lined up for the October school holidays!
    Watch this space...

Studies of Religion I (1 Viewer)

pb1234

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Messages
57
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
can someone please post a copy of the exam multiple choice?
 

hscwav2012

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
245
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Likely 48/50, although with the essay question back to pre-2009 style, so more likely 47/50. You're welcome.
It wouldn't be that high, a raw mark in the 90's wouldn't scale down. It would be around 44/45
 

studybot

New Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2012
Messages
29
Gender
Female
HSC
2013
Yeah you're right, >60 even for jut Christianity
Also, in the 2006 census 30% of Australians didn't state their religion or stated they had 'no religion'.
So, I completely agree with this : ))
 

Genero

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2011
Messages
23
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2013
Anyone hear about how everyone in the state went when the format of the essay was reverted to pre-2009?
 

_Arsenal_

Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
43
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
I had a complete mind-blank when writing about Qutb and ended up writing 3-4 pages on BS - I did mention his "Social justice" views, Mahijad(?spelling), and a few other views within his text, but it was poorly done. If I get 11/20 for it, I'd be more than suprised. MC - 7/10 probably and Christianity section II, pretty good, 13-14/15. So overall, not that bad, but not great.
 

c2topher

New Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
1
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Directly from a hsc marker
1.d
2.b
3.a
4.d
5.c
6.b
7.b
8.c
9.d
10.a
 

George121

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
313
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
For question 4 MC it was asking for the consequence of ecumenical dialogue or whatever
Is the formation of the uniting church a consequence or a benefit?
 

studybot

New Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2012
Messages
29
Gender
Female
HSC
2013
For question 4 MC it was asking for the consequence of ecumenical dialogue or whatever
Is the formation of the uniting church a consequence or a benefit?
Oh, that question.
It was regarding which church was formed as an influence of the ecumenical movement in Australia.
The word 'consequence' made me think too :I
 

febebebe

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
33
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
4 was D. The Uniting Church was formed as a result of ecumenical stuff from three littleys. I agree with your 9 and 10 however.
oh sorry brain freeze, yes, i put 4 as d too :p
 

posh bitch

Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
50
Location
sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
omg !
section 3, did we have to bring in the ethics and practice even though it only asked for person ?
 

jaev1n

New Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2011
Messages
6
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
omg !
section 3, did we have to bring in the ethics and practice even though it only asked for person ?
Yes, so many people made this mistake in our trial.
I'm led to believe we had to include all three sections in the extended response.
 

pb1234

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Messages
57
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
omg !
section 3, did we have to bring in the ethics and practice even though it only asked for person ?
I didn't, the question clearly asked for person. In other questions they are a bit more broad, allowing you to use all 3 parts - but in this question it didn't
 

Kieran95

Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2012
Messages
199
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Yes, so many people made this mistake in our trial.
I'm led to believe we had to include all three sections in the extended response.
It specifically said 'significant PERSON' for a reason. You would only talk about all 3 on a broader question
 

wavess

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2010
Messages
168
Location
Jurassic Park
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
It specifically said 'significant PERSON' for a reason. You would only talk about all 3 on a broader question
My teachers said yeah you do focus on that person, but you can also link it to the other aspects of the depth study.
 

pb1234

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Messages
57
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
My teachers said yeah you do focus on that person, but you can also link it to the other aspects of the depth study.
I think that with the question from 2009-2011 this was needed, but since they changed back to the pre-2009 format - you were meant to focus entirely on the person. However, adding a couple of paragraphs in relating to the other aspects can't hurt, although i didn't choose too since the question was so specific.
 

jaev1n

New Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2011
Messages
6
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
It specifically said 'significant PERSON' for a reason. You would only talk about all 3 on a broader question
True, but from what I've heard from teachers is that no matter the question - you need to manipulate it so you can discuss all three sections.
I'm just saying I did what I was told to do. My response was 75% person 25% practice/ethics.
Who knows though lmao
 

Kieran95

Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2012
Messages
199
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
True, but from what I've heard from teachers is that no matter the question - you need to manipulate it so you can discuss all three sections.
I'm just saying I did what I was told to do. My response was 75% person 25% practice/ethics.
Who knows though lmao
I'm pretty sure you would've been told this because just about no one predicted that they would revert back to the pre-2009 questions. Almost every teacher was expecting an open-ended question where you had the scope to talk about all three.

You may be right, but im 99.9% sure you were limited to just the significant person in this style question.
 

jaev1n

New Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2011
Messages
6
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
I'm pretty sure you would've been told this because just about no one predicted that they would revert back to the pre-2009 questions. Almost every teacher was expecting an open-ended question where you had the scope to talk about all three.

You may be right, but im 99.9% sure you were limited to just the significant person in this style question.
Probably right then, quite a lot of people in my class did all three, at least only 1.5 pages out of my response was the other two!
 

reps2g

Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
55
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
well considering that it was a "too an extent" question.. coudln't we argue using a "however" like in modern history? In saying that.. i only discussed the significant person aspect..
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top