Another narrow attack countered by a partisan rant. Exciting stuff.Beazley shines spotlight on missing penalty rates
The discount haberdashery chain Spotlight has been accused in Federal Parliament of using the new industrial relations laws to avoid paying overtime and penalty rates.
The Federal Opposition Leader, Kim Beazley, says the Australian Workplace Agreement (AWA) now being offered by the chain includes a rate of two cents above the award, but makes no provision for overtime or penalty rates.
He has asked the Government if it is appropriate that the new laws be used in such a way.
The Acting Prime Minister, Peter Costello, has defended the new laws saying they allow employers and workers to reach mutual agreements on pay and conditions.
"Employees are in a stronger position today than they have been for at least 30 years because unemployment is lower today than it has been for the last 30 years," he said.
"The proof is in the Govenrment's performance. This is a Government under which there has been massive job creation, this is a Government under which there have been real wage increases."
I suppose there would be a greater level of equality among the unskilled, in that all would be paid the same shit rate.withoutaface said:Suppose that employment does increase, because employers hire more people due to each new worker being slightly less expensive. This means that the former unemployed now have jobs. Now suppose this becomes so widespread that society runs out of unemployed and companies have to start offering better contracts to lure people away from a competitor, and thus we have a stabilisation where as many people as possible are employed, and there are indeed probably more wages being given out in total due to employers not having to substitute capital for labour as much as before. Does this not lead to a greater level of equality among the unskilled, with more money coming into it overall?
I agree, the reforms are disgusting.*Minka* said:I hope that these disgusting reforms are the beginning of the end for the Howard gvoernment. Now, we jsut have to hope we survivie until the next election.
Shit rate > unemployment.I suppose there would be a greater level of equality among the unskilled, in that all would be paid the same shit rate.
Still, it's a bit simplistic to assume that wage cuts = job creation.withoutaface said:Suppose that employment does increase, because employers hire more people due to each new worker being slightly less expensive. This means that the former unemployed now have jobs. Now suppose this becomes so widespread that society runs out of unemployed and companies have to start offering better contracts to lure people away from a competitor, and thus we have a stabilisation where as many people as possible are employed, and there are indeed probably more wages being given out in total due to employers not having to substitute capital for labour as much as before. Does this not lead to a greater level of equality among the unskilled, with more money coming into it overall?
It was pretty cowardly of them not to name the "free market economist" who said "there are plenty of jobs in fruit picking". I wonder if this free market economist even exists.Generator said:
It's exactly what many people on this forum (such as loquasagacious and withoutaface) have said in the past, so I really don't know why you are questioning the existence of the economist in question. Also, it's hardly cowardly if the economist spoke to the reporter yet asked to remain anonymous, is it?banco55 said:It was pretty cowardly of them not to name the "free market economist" who said "there are plenty of jobs in fruit picking". I wonder if this free market economist even exists.
Try trawling through this thread if you'd like a number of news articles. Apart from that, I suggest that you take a look at the report prepared by the Senate Employment, Workplace Relations and Education Committee. The wikipedia entry for WorkChoices also has a number of useful links (in particular the link to the official WorkChoices site and the link leading to the ACTU's site), but be sure to remember that the Wikipedia entry itself is probably not a suitable resource for a school assessment.davidw89 said:Hey guys..need help.
Iam doing an assignment that tells me to assess the important of the new Industrial Relation and its imapct on the Labour Market. Where could i find lots of information on that?