The Problem of Pamela Bradley (1 Viewer)

silvermoon

caffeine fiend
Joined
Mar 14, 2004
Messages
1,834
Location
getting the blood out of my caffeine system
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
angelduck said:
on a slightly realated note, i tried to read the illiad, but it was just as boring as shakespeare, why oh why cant i get a copy in english i understand??

Seriously guyz, no-one cares anymore, and classics-chic, if bradley wasnt a historian, her book wouldnt be bought/used/reccom,mednded by department of education
shakespeare is NOT boring ange! nor is homer. *shakes fist in duckys direction* dont make me set clack or harpie-queen on you! or even...the little camel...

asy, how could you say that?! i think half the ancient forum just dropped down dead!
 

silvermoon

caffeine fiend
Joined
Mar 14, 2004
Messages
1,834
Location
getting the blood out of my caffeine system
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
ah yes, the silvermoon seal of approval. accepted everywhere in NSW your mastercard is and where the trains run on time.
i think you either hate or luv ancient history --> mostly everyone here seems to luv it, or at least some parts.
 

AsyLum

Premium Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Messages
15,899
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Haha, oh dear, my swelling ego shall wreck vengeance upon all moderns!! *chuckles*

*cue mass virgin sacrifices and ritual bull de-balling*

Now to see if the sun god will rise and pronounce me king of the world via some earthly disaster!
 

classics_chic

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2004
Messages
203
Location
North-west of Sydney
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
Re: PwarYuex

I didn't intend to put any of this into an essay. This is a discussion, and anyone who knows anything about ancient history beyond a junior level knows you don't get resources straight from the web (unless they're links to scholarly articles, which this clearly is not)! I don't claim to be qualified, just interested. But if you're going to attack what I say, or my spelling, make sure you've got it right first. I don't mind people correcting me, but I do mind it when they're wrong.

Using the terminology "primary source" and "secondary source" is appropriate for high-school level (take note, HSCers, you're in the clear), but for someone who claims to be studying ancient history at a tertiary level as you are, you should know better. As you indicate, you finished your HSC in 2004, making you a university student (also indicated by your display of degree down the bottom).

Historians compile evidence, and simplify where appropriate. But that does not take it to inaccuracy, which I found in Bradley's book on Greece when I was in years 11-12. I argue that historians bring life to their work, while compilers do not. It's like comparing Polybius to an annalist. They don't compare. The same with Herodotos and Pamela Bradley. To be a historian, to undertake the intellectual field derived from Herodotos' historia , curiosity is a key, and interest is vital. History is based upon narrative: that is barely maintained in Bradley, and the only curiosity it ever aroused in me, or many of the people I've spoken to, is why it was set as a textbook.

Just because you don't understand the different genres at work within Herodotos, the vestiges of the different intellectual pushes during his time, and the unique (as far as we have left) way in which he combined the creativity of the Muse with the growing intellectual and philosophical movement in Greece, does not mean that he is incoherent. To judge Herodotos by modern standards does no justice to him, even though we use him in a modern context. History isn't all about dead white men fighting wars, you know. Herodotos' fascination with the other shows the political and ethnic circles in which he was moving and being moved, the problems he faced as a Carian (that's right, folks, he wasn't 'pure' Greek, let alone Athenian)

I also find your comments about my feminimity insulting. My lack of Y chromosome has nothing to do with my love for the classics, and to bring this into the debate is childish and normative: going back to a time where women were assumed not to be intelligent enough to study the classics. And, of course, you're automatically putting me into the category of 'bad' woman because I may have read more than you. I'm female, I enjoy ancient history. That is what my name means. To try and put me into some stereotype based upon... well, I don't know what (I have experience in ancient history, but not sexism) just shows that you're afraid of something. What, little old me? To call me sexist names just because I bring up elements of the history you may not have heard of is completely inappropriate.

And to insinuate that I haven't learnt ancient languages! Well, I never! Why do you think I spell Greek names in such a funny way? Because that's how they spell them in the Greek!

Note to angelduck: persist with the Iliad, it's great. And also, just because a book is recommended by people doesn't mean it's wonderful. Pamela Bradley has her purposes- a bibliography (see her notes for the real sources/ commentaries- Bury is far better for Greece) and a paperweight. Her information has left many people stranded in their HSC because there's not enough of it, or it contradicts other sources. What are they going to do then? They don't have time to read Herodotos or Bury, so they just improvise... and it gets them into trouble.
 

Protector

a little unsane
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Messages
174
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Just to make a few points...

PwarYuex said:
Oh, that's good, I'm sure you can put that in an essay.
No more than you can Pamela Bradley...

PwarYuex said:
Which of my terminology was incorrect, may I ask?
I'd go with calling a text-book writer a historian...

PwarYuex said:
Are you serious? Are you saying that a historian does not compile and simplify evidence?
I'm fairly sure she was saying that Pamela Bradley isn't a historian... how about you go ask a year 7 history teacher if she is...

PwarYuex said:
No, apparently you can't compile and simplify evidence and still be a historian, according to you. Every historian must not compile; but rather leave all the history fragmented, and not simplify; but must keep everything in its confusing form.
A historian has an opinion. She doesn't. Got a dictionary?

PwarYuex said:
I'm going to stop responding to you there, because you're a patronising bitch, totally deserved of the title "Classics Chick" in all its glory and nasty connotations- "I read Classics at Oxfon" style.
First of all you've just displayed Sexism. Read the terms and conditions lately?

And while I'm not so strongly against Pamela Bradley as classics_chic I will say this much: The pseudo-esoteric ramblings of true historians juxstaposed with the refuse that is a Pamela Bradley textbook should, at least in my opinion, give you some more understanding on the subject matter.

While she may be useful for the last minute "what happened in x B.C." or "was Caesar male or female" there ends the extent of her use for MOST year 12s. Of course, there are those of us who know what a source is and those that believe Bradley is a historian. With that, I bid you good day, and one day your world will crash around you when you quote Thomas the Tank Engine for your masters paper.

Good day.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top