ok d00d. here are the facts - look at the 2 opening paragraphs of my essay and tell me whether or not i "answered the question"
"In 1961, E.H. Carr in his seminal work observed, ‘Every human being at every stage of history, or pre history is born into a society and from his earliest years moulded by that society.’ Carr’s statement can be applied to the textual arena, and emphasises the extent to which conceptual matrices inherently determine literary discourse. Such conceptual matrices are intimately shaped by our contemporary context and culture. Thus literary practice can be established as being influenced by culture. Indeed the two temporally and contextually diverse texts Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World and Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner, manage to satirically represent humanity’s dysfunctional relationship with nature. Whilst the subtleties of these texts have been shaped by contemporary context, they largely exhibit similar dystopic definitions of ‘the wild’ and the prospect of human advancement.
Scott’s eclectic pastiche BR, drawing on elements of ‘Film Noir’, science fiction, and the detective genres, denounces assumptions about the evolution of civilised society. The film implicitly challenges our interpretation and understanding of ‘the wild.’ Indeed humanity’s non-existent relationship with ‘the wild’ appears to have hurled Scott’s futuristic society, into a veritable moral ‘wilderness.’"
ill let u be the judge
how can i take you seriously?
