I didn't mean to start a disagreement in the replies. (anyone using slurs against each other, it's not very nice so don't it)
I think we understand (even if you guys don't agree with one another) that there are differences or a gap between rural and urban schools. Whether rural could just try harder, or that they aren't given many resources to do so.
I think our question should be 'why?'. Why is it that rural schools performing worse (like apart from limited resources, they've got the internet access etc. Is being at a rural just cursed to perform worse, even if you're doing well?). Why is it that some schools in urban areas also perform bad, even with the resources rural schools don't have (not sure if this is true)?
What should be changed so these disadvantages in certain schools can lessen the impact it has on well performing students?
(if i said something that isn't true pls ignore it)