fortune_cookie
Banned
- Joined
- May 18, 2012
- Messages
- 193
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
I think it is crap tbh.
All subjects should have equal weight (like they do in commerce). Not:
10% first year
20% second year
30% third year
40% fourth year
If a person goes really well at first year subjects, they should be rewarded. It shouldn't be worth less just because the concepts are relatively easier. If someone is a hard worker from the very start of university then they should be rewarded. It would certainly stop (well, not entirely, but it would minimise) the whole "i'll try harder next semester" mentality. When you finish the degree it will not even show if you did really good or really bad at first year.
All subjects should have equal weight (like they do in commerce). Not:
10% first year
20% second year
30% third year
40% fourth year
If a person goes really well at first year subjects, they should be rewarded. It shouldn't be worth less just because the concepts are relatively easier. If someone is a hard worker from the very start of university then they should be rewarded. It would certainly stop (well, not entirely, but it would minimise) the whole "i'll try harder next semester" mentality. When you finish the degree it will not even show if you did really good or really bad at first year.
Last edited: