azzie
so delicious...
yeah at least 2 or 3 test drivessped_kid01 said:i think u should 'try before u buy'
yeah at least 2 or 3 test drivessped_kid01 said:i think u should 'try before u buy'
I agree, its like going through a relationship without being intimate...jellybeenz said:Nope. For me sex is a part of intimacy and I couldn't marry someone I wasn't intimate with. Sex isn't the most important thing in a relationship but I still think it is important. I wouldn't marry someone unless I had been dating them for at least 2 years-- and I don't think I could wait that long to have sex with somebody I loved.
Not entirely defined by sex? So besides finding his 'performance' by fucking him, whatelse would you find about him?sped_kid01 said:no
what happens if u get married and he's terrible?
not that its entirely defined by sex...but i think u should 'try before u buy'
Oh, I dunno, a reason to dislike him?berry580 said:Not entirely defined by sex? So besides finding his 'performance' by fucking him, whatelse would you find about him?
ahhh...well i would hope i wouldnt be 'fucking him' if i didnt know anything about him?berry580 said:Not entirely defined by sex? So besides finding his 'performance' by fucking him, whatelse would you find about him?
I'm sure if you read it more slowly you'll realise berry580 is asking what you'll find out about them by having sex with them.sped_kid01 said:i dont really understand what u mean?
Then that only proves one thing, and that is you've found the wrong guy. Simple.sped_kid01 said:ahhh...well i would hope i wouldnt be 'fucking him' if i didnt know anything about him?
i dont really understand what u mean?
i mean the relationship isnt defined by sex, it has to have other attributes too. marriage is pretty serious, u would both have to be PRETTY sure...
i just dont think u should not have sex with a person, simply for the fact that ur not married...imagine getting married to a guyt u were in love with, only to find he had a bunch of STD's on ur wedding nite which he failed to mention
JKDDragon said:Really? I thought the term was pretty subjective. I generally interpreted it as 'sexual intercourse'.. but hey like I said it was subjective. But yes, if I was only restricted to pathetic means of getting off such as erm.. dry sex (which would also increase my shopping bills on laundry detergent), I think I'd have to let go of the relationship.
lol...how can u come to the conclusion that i have found the wrong guy?berry580 said:Then that only proves one thing, and that is you've found the wrong guy. Simple.
"i dont really understand what u mean? "
What I'm basically trying to say is that, if a relationship is entirely defined by sex, then why do you need to have sex before marriage?
Sorry, it's-sped_kid01 said:lol...how can u come to the conclusion that i have found the wrong guy?
i am very much satisfyed with my bf, both sexually and mentally/emotionally...thanx 4 ur concern tho!
i still dont understand what ur saying? "if a relationship is defined by sex, then why do u need to have sex b4 marriage"
im not saying a relationship is defined by sex...but im saying its important (to me)...and i dont see the POINT, of NOT having sex b4 ur married....if ur both ready...and it makes u feel good, then why wouldnt u?
It was hyyothetical. First it is presupposed that one thing you look for in a partner is honesty/trust. Then, building on this, it follows that if you find and marry a partner who has STDs, but they didn't tell you, logic dictates that your partner is an incorrect one.sped_kid01 said:lol...how can u come to the conclusion that i have found the wrong guy?
ok...i see ur point, and thats fair enough if thats ur beliefs...berry580 said:Sorry, it's-
"if a relationship isn't defined by sex, then why do u need to have sex b4 marriage"