Of course. There would be a very strict syllabus on what is and is not allowed to be taught.
Realise was talking about "monitoring" progress obviously. If you do well in an exam, it shows your doing fine, hence achieving the monitoring .
This would be a very repressive cirriculum and would eliminate all forms of individual learning. That would suck balls. My best teachers are the ones who know their topics and can approach it in an interesting and engaging manner. They often speak off the cuff and give funny examples etc. Are you saying these teachers should be sacked in favour of teachers who read from the syllabus and highlight from a textbook?
you're forgetting that people aren't robots again
Eh, it's a grey area.
I imagine they would get pretty bored if there were no artists in the world.
I would do away with ATARs altogether. At the end of each year of school (however many years that may be), students would be assessed as being either competent or incompetent. If competent they progress to the next part of their education, if incompetent they repeat the component/year until they are deemed to be competent.
I can, but under what name. It's more than just tutoring, it's sort of education reform-y.
Yes. Although instead of 'shit' jobs as you put it, I would call it middle tier jobs that perhaps do not require university education (i.e. trades etc).
Yeah ...
This is retarded. I'll just give one example why I really disagree with this. Obviously different people have different natural abilities. Person A is really slow and has to repeat year 3 four times. What happens to his self esteem? You have just destroyed an individual's view of his self-worth. That is WAY more important in my view that any form of marks or achievement or anything.
It's a intriguing discussion
No one cares who starts the thread, but I've made an edit for you.
