its kinda shitass but i went likeeee bergsonian memory works to undermine stability of time --> subverts romantic values throughout the entire poem to critique the despondency of modern milieu. something like that. i dont entirely get it either HAHA
liek urban decay, environmental decal, moral degradation, perpetual motion of time, life destroying the soul... idk tbh i swear its the same poem as preludes
i have to google at least 3 words here
Exactly, both Preludes and Rhapsody are my replacement paragraphs (in case one gets mandated) and I literally just wrote the same stuff for both, just changed up the quotes and analysis
yeah when i was planning the essay i literally copy pasted the rhapsody paragraph and changed 'rhapsody' to 'preludes'
preludes and rhapsody are literally the same poem it was so hard making them sound different when prepping bc they have literally the same things,, fuck off w this oeuvre shit
omg i literally just had a look at that question. idk if im right at all but i thinks just talk about the context of the past author, e.g. religious influences of shakespeares writing for example?
sameee
Exactly, the only difference is that preludes emphasises the circularity of time, whilst rhapsody is just about its inevitability + fancy stuff about lunar synthesis
how are you guys hating on magi its the most straightforwardly analysable one
Exactlyyy I do Prufrock + Hollow Men + Magi because it shows a progression the best
straight up i just dont get it LMAO
forget the weird time and memory sucking souls stuff. just do urban decay and talk about the contrast between the manmade (lamp) and the natural (moon). the lamp is given authority and narrates as it sputters and mutters and says this one really fucking long sentence of dialogue. the moon is described in this really ugly (i forgot how- i wanna so something about crooks or wrinkles? idk) as you creep toward the last page of the poem (you can interpret this in whatever way you want - which is good because you can just flip it to answer the question). so the moon is like the victim, the lamp is just stomping over everything and the moon is seen as this evil been with her face crust and evil lunar incantations. idk
my mod b is 15% and mod a, c and paper 1 are 5%. like my common mod essay was literally 2.5% why did i even try at that point lol
have you tried reading it yet
oh period okay maybe i just dont want to talk about anglocatholicism..... im so worried about doing poorly on account of not properly hitting the textual integrity element since we never had an assessment on mod b
Just draw links between the poems casually and talk about "stylistic integrity" and you'll be fine
