Search results

our school used to tell us what week they were going to have these random inspections, but now they've given up. just told us what day they were going to do it, so you just came prepared. it's the dodgiest system ever. almost got a DT for my boater, cause I refused to buy a new one or repair the...

4U was harder than 3U, as it should be. But 3U was nicely balanced I'd say. Had both easy and hard components, with enough time to work on the harder ones for the 4U students. I did b)i) a different way, but everyone I know did it your way. Mine was just longer.

just integrate the expansion of (1-x)^n twice and you get the answer... with the substitution of x of course.

yea something like that. pretty freaky, its like syd grammar and james ruse divide it up like a cake, and the rest hopefully get the crumbs. what other schools perform that high?

That's just cause we rule! :D but nevertheless we still suck :rolleyes: as if I'd vote for my own school. I'm glad I'm outta there! no more stupid uniform inspections, boaters, and snobbish yr9s to annoy me. and as for the apple chapel...urgh, very glad I'm outta there! but man...

LOL the wonderland excursion was really fun not really helpful physics wise. They just gave us a huge number of worksheets to do, and you just end up timing things, calculating basics like speed=dist x time just go there and have fun...and either fudge or copy the answers off someone else :p...

can't find anything like that but for a comprehensible report, that tells you how well the candidature did for each question, go here: http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/hsc_exams/hsc2000exams/index4.html#m for 1995-2000

Differentiate becomes:2^x ln2 Integrate becomes: 2^x/ln2 + C It's not in the syllabus though I think. Oh well here's the process for differentiation. same sort of thing for integration y=2^x log2 y=x lny = x ln2 lny=xln2 differentiate implicitly end up with dy=yln2dx sub...

wanted to scare next year's candidature to learn every single poem possible I was waiting for them to specify a poem. Just didn't think they were going to specify the one I knew the most :p

Its perfectly fine The syllabus never said you couldn't. One of my friends asked whether he could do that a few months back, and our teacher said it was fine (our teacher was one of the people on the committee who created the new syllabus)

you sure that's right laz? cause you've done p(at least 2 )= 1 - [p(1 rat each exit) + p(2 rat one exit)] cause p[none] either means no rat goes through that exit, which doesn't make sense, or means that one rat goes in each exit. so p[one] would be that one two rats go through the same exit?

does anyone have any young supervisors? all ours are really old guys.

well if you talked about specific events in those texts, to support how they affected your perception, should be ok I used 2 extras, and kinda vaguely referred to 2 others. Like one sentence :p.

Joe - deep logical literary thinker Sue - Feminist, Petrarchan, fairly shallow reading. Just went straight into it, as if it was an extension of the conversation, and ended it like they were going to talk about something else.

Its just so they know how many books we've handed in, and to make sure that we've handed them all in. They practically spend the first 2-3 days just making sure they have all the books, and then distributing them to the marking centres. If they lose it well its not like we're going to know :p...

They have asked a question where you had to go through the whole process of the dv dx stuff. all the way from first principles. it was the only way you could answer it, because they asked you to explain/prove the result... it's in one of the earlier 4unit papers, like 1990/1991. something...

I've only seen it on my teacher's comp... didn't know it was on here. what link was it?

hehe that's mad. I didn't think you guys would look through them all though. Just dump them into some machine and process them. Maybe that's why its always like half a year before we get something back :p.

thought that when i first read the question. but it doesn't mean that. You can have someone who values donnes work in a negative way, so its perfectly fine. great_gregory...I'm sure its fine...I'm just now sure how you got them talking when they both love different things :p. I'm thinking...

yours is fine. As long as you demonstrated a different point of view by each reader, even if they agree, then its fine. I just had two people who didn't agree on the same way of viewing poetry in general, like a shallow person, against someone who values logic, and then expanded it to my...