The one for real GDP, where it has Nominal/CPI *100 -- is that just assuming that CPI in the base year is 100? Cause if it was say 120, wouldn't you have to multiply by 120
Technique for "but he knows his heart and mind now belong to that tower forever"?
Like I feel like it could be personification, but it doesn't seem right and I know there would be a better alternative
For this Q: Analyse the effects of a sustained increase in a current account deficit on the Australian economy.
The marking criteria has stuff on the causes... Isn't this asking purely for the effects??
Another similar one I don't understand. Please explain. If it's simple algebra I will :chainsaw:
10. Assume that C = 100 + 0.75Y and I = 200. What is the equilibrium level of national income?
(A) 300
(B) 375
(C) 1200
(D) 1375
Re: 2015 HSC Economics Marathon
Not necessarily. Holding reserve assets is just like the nation saving money (just not in their own currency). This is beneficial if a central bank is required to 'dirty the float' as they aren't able to purchase AUD with AUD for example, they'd require other...
Function is increasing where the first derivation is positive, i.e. > 0
That would mean -2 < x < 0 and x > 1 (Assuming your graph is correct)
It can't be Greater than or equal to because at that turning point f'(x)=0 and therefore not >0 (as function is increasing at where f'(x)>0)
Yes. This is exactly what I thought. Obviously for this question it must be the correct answer as MER is the solution. However, I do think you're right to say that increasing competition alone won't reduce the NAIRU.
In regards to the bolded bit, I believe that in the long term it would --...