Search results

here's the thing though, interpretations are subjective. i've also heard people say that there are parts of the qur'an that support violence towards non-muslims. that its in the material itself. if that is a viewpoint that can be argued with quotes, does that make it valid? i think to look at a...

my point has nothing to do with the actual numbers, just perception

ignoring, of course that the u.s. is forbidden from assassinations and that if saddam had been killed, one of his sons would mostly likly rise to power.

yeah, but, i don't think really anyone outside of australia is aware of them

honestly, i don't think that science means that there can't be a god....though i do believe it removes the possibility of an activly involved god. were i to ever fall into the ranks of theistic thought, it'd be as a deist. the idea that there is a god, he just kickstarted things and then sat...

though i still am surprised the tourism commerical features camels....i think about 4% of americans, at least, would ever associate camels with australia. ever. and i'm being extremely generous. i would think that'd hold true for elsewhere

that simpsons episode is responsible for 35% of waht americans know about australia

the basic form is that if you have some function Ax^n + (other lower powers of x) + B where A and B are just integers, all the possible factors you need to try are factors of B over factors of A, both positive and negative values. So, for example, for: 6x^4 + 3x^3 - 5x^2 +x -8 your number...

and evolution does explain why there are differences in appearance. otherwise, why ARE there differences of any level?

and it costs more to keep someone in prison than to release them

so, your explanation for background radiation is what? and so then you don't believe in an expanding universe?

so, waht you're saying is you don't believe in any scientific theory? please, go jump off a bridge or building. the predictions based off the theories of gravity are just made up, so you might fly off instead of fall to the ground. i'll have to post in hear again after i hear stephen hawking...

i didn't say rape has no place in discussing abortion, just that rape has no place in discussing issues with incest. I'm in no way contesting the rape portion...... just that incest is irrelevant. I've also not been able to find any numbers that show that incest has an excessively high risk...

remember girls, guys won't care about the finer details of your appearance if you're not wearing a shirt

i'm reminded of seeing this carried out very well. i was doing a charity thing which meant a lot of people killing time on a sidewalk....and across the street were two people very busy with one another.....about 10 or 15 people were watching them across the street for a while, then they sent...

now thats the best stuff on a listing i've seen thus far (big fan of Cussler)

gh3y, by that logic, does this mean i can call you on any post that contains facts taht are online, theoretically? my whole post was written without activly looking at sources. personal knowledge on the matter, not that i just went and looked stuff up and put it togetehr. i try to make sure to...

yeah, but, the point is, if they break up with you, they had a reason for it. and they'd have to say that that reason is gone to try going back.

so, you've got no counter whatsoever to what i said as far as the formation of the earth

well, there is family history. second, we can identify the genes associated with many genetic disorders now. and again, you can't bring in rape. i'm not questioning have an exception for rape. i'm saying that there is not significant enough of a risk, generally speaking, taht can be...