Search results

if its not supposed to be on aquired intelligence, why did that site mention trivia as a portion of it?

not generally, only in some cases. and i've not heard the case made, then, that you should also group other risk factors.... if we're talking purely from a genetic point of view, then the exception should be for any case of little genetic variation or any case where the parents are both likly to...

i like that that just justified something via evolution and the bible at the same time

theres a right time and place for everything. "right now" and "in public" are usually not it

from my experience, there is NOTHING you can do to get them back. i've tried far too much to be healthy in my time with that goal in mind.

ok, my arguement is that while the health of the mother and rape are very unique circumstances, there should not be any special treatment of incest because that doesn't, generally speaking, create a significant risk to the baby. you brought up incest as a form of rape, and my counter was that...

if the different races are the sons of Noah then why are there more than 3 races?

Re: alpha christians well it also wasn't directed toward you

based off of a couple different wikipedia articles: The Mujahideen in Afghanistan were fighting the Russians trying to invade the country. The end of the Cold War led to the American-backed Mujahideen winning as Russia pulled back. However, the Mujahideen were unsuccessful at creating a gov't...

and a woman who drinks a lot could've been raped while drunk, too. i see the rape thing as relevant, yes, but see, i never questioned the rape exception, just the incest exception. if its incestuous it doesn't make the rape any less, um...rapey.

Re: alpha christians thanks gobaby, i was wondering if anyone would bother to read that much....lol

no, they do want selective treatment though...tolerance of them. Remember the cartoons? during that everyone else was to respect their faith, and those calls were coming from the SAME islamic world that doesn't see anything wrong with putting someone to death because of what that person believes...

purely by definition, it would be impossible for anyone else to join. secondly, i'd highly doubt it unless one member is from india and one is from china.

you pay for Mensa, too, so theres not that much of a difference. the trick would be a test where the organisation grading you has no financial incentive to pass you, and ideally, not that expensive anyway

you're trying to put my claim into a framework... i'm just objecting, generally, to anyone bringing incest into the issue of abortion because i don't think it is at all relevant. i'm not using this purely as a criticism of pro-choice people, but the debate as a whole. though, i'm not sure how...

yeah, i think the proper comparison, sam04u, was if the western world was executing people just because they were Muslim, which isn't happening. again, he's being executed for an IDEA, not for an action

i'm speculating they don't have $80 worth of stuff though i'll give em one thing...the trivia quiz was fun

the definition of "added benefit" is much in question here

sam04u, thats not the law in afghanistan. the law as i've read it described for this is that you are allowed freedom of religion, and only muslims are subject to islamic law. all this guy did was convert from islam to christianity. they've said that he'll not get punished if he says he's not...

important question.... not-that-bright, are you smart enough to spend $80 to have a website tell you you're smart? secondary offer, i'll do it for $20