Class of 2025 (2025 HSC CHAT) (36 Viewers)

[quokka]

youve just made the situation more worse socialism because you continue to be vague about why she was banned and not the niko person letting us believe you've banned her in favour for your political views...

 

[Socialism]

your literally letting personal feelings impact your decisions

that's... really not what has happened... as i have previously stated, ignoring is an infractable offence. i did not take action on a single post where gossigirl attacked me, but not following moderator requests is an offence. gossipgirl's behaviour leading up to the post backs up the infraction, as a history of these posts can be seen.

 

[harxs]

wow 98 viewers, peak 2025 chat

 

[Socialism]

youve just made the situation more worse socialism because you continue to be vague about why she was banned and not the niko person letting us believe you've banned her in favour for your political views...

i can't believe i'm getting drawn into this.
I support palestine, not israel. i've already stated that the ban had no relationship to the content of the prior conversation

 

[quokka]

that's... really not what has happened... as i have previously stated, ignoring is an infractable offence. i did not take action on a single post where gossigirl attacked me, but not following moderator requests is an offence. gossipgirl's behaviour leading up to the post backs up the infraction, as a history of these posts can be seen.

of what her saying why do mods delete random messages

 

[Socialism]

niko hasn't been banned because we're NOT restricting speech about palestine and israel. gossipgirl was not banned for supporting palestine

 

[shibikoro]

niko hasn't been banned because we're NOT restricting speech about palestine and israel. gossipgirl was not banned for supporting palestine

ok this makes it more clear but what did she do exactly

 

[quokka]

niko hasn't been banned because we're NOT restricting speech about palestine and israel. gossipgirl was not banned for supporting palestine

ok so u just contradicted urself saying that it was off topic for them to be talking abt it

 

[C2H6O]

I'm going to pause on responding to messages after this so that the situation might cool down, a little.

The posts were removed, and that was the end of that situation. I then reminded users to stay on topic, but a certain user did not respect that request. that is the reason for the ban. Users are free to discuss their thoughts on both Israel and Palestine, in threads that are more appropriate. When I say, "the end of the situation", I mean that moderator actions taken were not as a result of any particular messages posted in that conversation. As i said earlier, it was not just for the one-time defiance. the user had been publically challenging my decisions for several days in the lead-up and the post today was just the catalyst for the ban.

i would like to please urge you to make impartial decisions as stipulated by your moderation application. actions such as bans and deletions should not be influenced by personal grievances as this would be an abuse of moderation. furthermore there is no ruling in which a user must stay on topic, thus users did not have probable motive to heed the warning, given that it was made baselessly. please look into the situation again, and if i am wrong then i will leave it at that, but until the argument has been dissected my point stands. thank you.

 

[harxs]

niko hasn't been banned because we're NOT restricting speech about palestine and israel. gossipgirl was not banned for supporting palestine

wallah i still dont like u

 

[tigerian]

youve just made the situation more worse socialism because you continue to be vague about why she was banned and not the niko person letting us believe you've banned her in favour for your political views...

socialism had a reason and it wasn’t personal . It may have been an error but we musnt be judgemental and we don’t need to why . There is a reason it’s confid and we need to respect that whether we agree or not

I wouled like to see justice done and gossipgirl given a chance especially as its a difficult time . Can I ask for a reconsideration regarding gossipgirl along with a notice of what is not acceptable so this issue doesnt continue .

I wont interfere now but I wanted to share that for what it’s worth

regards

 

[harxs]

guys I just think I saw a rat , I'm deep down the trenches

 

[quokka]

guys I just think I saw a rat , I'm deep down the trenches

so real king

 

[killer queen]

that's... really not what has happened... as i have previously stated, ignoring is an infractable offence. i did not take action on a single post where gossigirl attacked me, but not following moderator requests is an offence. gossipgirl's behaviour leading up to the post backs up the infraction, as a history of these posts can be seen.

Hello there!

I know I might be adding fuel to the fire, but I'm gonna try and phrase my thoughts as eloquently as possible:

Me personally, I don't think drawing political views into this is relevant (although if you guys wanna talk about that go ahead). Thank you @Socialism for addressing this though. Also, I don't think anybody is denying the fact that we should be following moderator instructions. At the risk of sounding offensive (or hell, being banned) I think that the reason everyone is protesting is because nobody can see why her actions warranted deletion in the first place. If somebody doesn't believe their actions wrong, doesn't it make sense they ignore it?

As @C2H6O said, we - or at least I - do respect you, and your moderator position. (All hail the orange banner!) It is undoubtable that you have a meaningful and large presence here, so I'm not calling that into question. But I believe many of us 2025ers find it a tad uncomfortable considering you're younger than the majority of us - especially those of us who knew you before - and further, these deletions (as far as I'm aware) only ramped up after your promotion. I'm not attacking you, I'm just pointing out an alternative viewpoint.

We understand that infractions are infractions, and that the moderator's word is the moderator's word. However, I think we feel that this particular ruling has been a bit heavy-handed - at least that a ban wasn't in order, though a warning, sure. It has never really been mentioned in the past how 'necessary' staying on topic was, and since this thread (which I assume is where everything occurred) is titled 'chat', we all chat about whatever topics we desire. At least, before an outright ban, a clearer warning and declaration of forum rules would have been in order?

(God, I sound like a moderator now!)

Anyways, toodles!

 

[hotitalian]

Can we keep fighting?

 

[quokka]

Can we keep fighting?

im 30 messages away from 1000 lets keep it going

 

[harxs]

socialism im blaming u if I fail my sac exam , stop putting ur negative aura around me

 

[quokka]

Can we keep fighting?

im going to start a fight with you so i can get up to 1k

 

[quokka]

socialism im blaming u if I fail my sac exam , stop putting ur negative aura around me

omg i also do sac im so so cooked

 

[quokka]

why did u say that abt me @hotitalian