-
Looking for HSC notes and resources? Check out our Notes & Resources page
CLAW1001 Thread (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter ToO LaZy ^*
- Start date
ToO LaZy ^*
n/a
and tibet is considered pretty free 
anyone want to put it in simple english?
EDIT: i have the 2004 edition...so im not sure how 'clear' the 2005 explains it...=(
mine explains it in like...hebrew or some other language..
anyone want to put it in simple english?
EDIT: i have the 2004 edition...so im not sure how 'clear' the 2005 explains it...=(
mine explains it in like...hebrew or some other language..
yvonne_710
Don't Lie
sarevok said:
my one is also wednesday at 11. I had Amy. God she's a fucking bitch... marks assignments so hard. I spent an entire week working on the second assignment and got 11.5/20. Her only comment at the end was " You need to talk about implied terms". And she fuckin barely writes anything on the board
^^ cool. are you asian? if so i have no idea who you are
if i understand latimer correctly, a non-delegable duty of care is simply a 'higher' duty of care...you must ensure that all reasonable care is taken, and there is a higher standard of care involved.
damn, brett bonfield's notes suck. beginning to wish i actually went to those lectures =\
if i understand latimer correctly, a non-delegable duty of care is simply a 'higher' duty of care...you must ensure that all reasonable care is taken, and there is a higher standard of care involved.
damn, brett bonfield's notes suck. beginning to wish i actually went to those lectures =\
sorry, I meant to address that to yvonne
that's pretty sucky though, so far in claw i've gotten 12.5/10, 16/20 and 9/10 doing all the assignments the night before they were due...and they all sucked. =\ guess you just got bad luck with your tutor
that's pretty sucky though, so far in claw i've gotten 12.5/10, 16/20 and 9/10 doing all the assignments the night before they were due...and they all sucked. =\ guess you just got bad luck with your tutor
Last edited:
ToO LaZy ^*
n/a
sif did them the night before..teh liar!!1
ToO LaZy ^*
n/a
yeah, im thinking of doing that..sarevok said:
im gonna bookmark all the important stuff..and probably make a list of cases
yvonne_710
Don't Lie
yah, i am asian? and i dont think i know u..........errrrrr........sarevok said:^^ cool. are you asian? if so i have no idea who you are
if i understand latimer correctly, a non-delegable duty of care is simply a 'higher' duty of care...you must ensure that all reasonable care is taken, and there is a higher standard of care involved.
damn, brett bonfield's notes suck. beginning to wish i actually went to those lectures =\
ToO LaZy ^*
n/a
..what do law students have?
For tutorial week 8, what is the issue of the salesperson saying 'oh, she'll be apples...'? are we meant to define it as a condition/warranty and talk about breach, or we are meant to talk about it in the context of misrepresentation re. the exclusion clause (like in curtis v chemical cleaning)?
It says the statement was made 'before she purchased the ticket'
I'm thinking now we're just meant to do the pre-K statement becoming a term test because the statement wasn't directly about the exclusion clause
edit: but can an exclusion clause exclude liability for negligence?
I'm thinking now we're just meant to do the pre-K statement becoming a term test because the statement wasn't directly about the exclusion clause
edit: but can an exclusion clause exclude liability for negligence?
Last edited:
yvonne_710
Don't Lie
i got one in my comp before but i deleted..er............ but i still have the hand-writing one..kow_dude said: