• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Dat circle geo (1 Viewer)

fishrushed

Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2012
Messages
96
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Apparently some of my friends said it was easy, saying it was "textbook stuff". I felt really smart after doing the question :D probably because I've never done much questions where you had to construct something that was not hinted at in the question.
 

spongebob1

New Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
22
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
I did a kite of BQAP with Q(T)P being the cross section of it proving opposite sides were equal. would this be valid or no?
 

MATHmaster

Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
195
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
How many marks will I lose if I assume it's a straight line?
I used alternate angles for angle qbt and angle pat and the other two, then 'proved' it was collinear. Can I get 2/3?
 

Web Addict

Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
462
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
I constructed the common tangent at T and proved that the angles were vertically opposite, therefore Q, T and P are colliear. I wonder if this would be accepted.
 

SpiralFlex

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
6,960
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
This goes to show you should always look at the wording first as well as the diagram.
 

yasminee96

Active Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
346
Gender
Female
HSC
2013
I don't understand why it can't be assumed as a straight line? It says "the line AT intersects C2 at B", so doesnt it just suggest that the line AT is produced to B?
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
I don't understand why it can't be assumed as a straight line? It says "the line AT intersects C2 at B", so doesnt it just suggest that the line AT is produced to B?
That's all good. But if you use alternate angles on angle BQP and APQ, that's assuming that QTP is a straight line in the first place.
 

SpiralFlex

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
6,960
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
I don't understand why it can't be assumed as a straight line? It says "the line AT intersects C2 at B", so doesnt it just suggest that the line AT is produced to B?
I'm gonna say it's a poor choice of wording. Well at least to me it sounds ambiguous. The sentence quoted makes no sense to me. Or maybe my English isn't up to scatch
 

bangladesh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2012
Messages
1,027
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
But how did you prove that?
It was the only way i could think of, BUT
You say that they are similar, then you say that the triangles touch at T and you use the other line to prove that the points were collinear. I can't remember the points exactly because i have forgotten if it was A,B,C or whatever it was.
Not sure if it's the right way tho, but it was the only way that i thought of.
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
It was the only way i could think of, BUT
You say that they are similar, then you say that the triangles touch at T and you use the other line to prove that the points were collinear. I can't remember the points exactly because i have forgotten if it was A,B,C or whatever it was.
Not sure if it's the right way tho, but it was the only way that i thought of.
But how are they similar? You would have to assume the result to prove it (unless there is some really obscure way of doing so).
 

iBibah

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
1,374
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
This is how I did it, which I'm pretty sure is right:

 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top