That source is generally accepted by biblical scholars to have been corrupted, and no part of it is reliable.Secular Evidence:
"In fact, we can almost reconstruct the gospel just from early non-Christian sources: Jesus was called the Christ (Josephus)
Scholars who promote the conclusion that Jesus is a myth sometimes use this early rabbinic literature to show that the Jesus stories of the gospels derive from a Jewish teacher in the first or second century BC.did “magic,” led Israel into new teachings, and was hanged on Passover for them (Babylonian Talmud)
Tacitus makes remarks about early christians, and is considered by some scholars to be simply repeating what he heard from other christians in his time.in Judea (Tacitus)
Charles Guignebert, who does not doubt that Jesus of the Gospels lived in Gallilee in the first century, nevertheless dismisses this letter as acceptable historical evidence: "Only the most robust credulity could reckon this assertion as admissible evidence for the historicity of Jesus"which his followers believed, worshipping Him as God (Pliny the Younger)."
I just read the wiki article anyhow. Historicity of Jesus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
None of those sources is beyond significant doubt.