Extension One Revising Game (2 Viewers)

addikaye03

The A-Team
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
1,267
Location
Albury-Wodonga, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
youngminii said:
Oh shit.
Is it because sin(180 - theta) = sin(theta)?
So theta can be 74'37' OR 105'22'?

P.S. You're a genius Trebla
But, if u went ahead and found angle ACB the 105 degree one wouldn't be allowed, due to the 180 degree restriction. I think im missing something..

EDIT: i see now... i am an idiot! Anyone had any luck on my previous Q
 
Last edited:

Timothy.Siu

Prophet 9
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,449
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
addikaye03 said:
But, if u went ahead and found angle ACB the 105 degree one wouldn't be allowed, due to the 180 degree restriction. I think im missing something..
why?
ones 105, and the others 40,
 

Trebla

Administrator
Administrator
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
8,171
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
My Year 11 teacher always said that whenever you use the sine rule, watch out for the ambiguous case...lol.

However, in this case the other answer is possible, because the angle is small enough to be feasible.

In most simple cases, the other angle is too large such that the sum of two angles already exceeds 180 degrees.
 
Last edited:

addikaye03

The A-Team
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
1,267
Location
Albury-Wodonga, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Trebla said:
My Year 11 teacher always said that whenever you use the sine rule, watch out for the ambiguous case...lol.

However, in this case the other answer is possible, because the angle is small enough to be feasible.

In most simple cases, the other angle is too large such that the sum of two angles already exceeds 180 degrees.
Yer thanks, I did watch for that but for some reason i left angle ACB as 65 degrees and thought well its not possible then as it exceeds 180 degrees. For some reason i didnt realise that angle ACB variated due to angle ABC. Sorry bout the stupid confusion everyone lol
 

bored of sc

Active Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
2,314
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
addikaye03 said:
Question: Prove by mathematical induction, the sum of the exterior angles of a n-sided polygon=360 degrees
(1) n = 1, x = sum of exterior angles, s = sum of interior angles = (n-2)180
x+s = 180n
x = 180n-s
x = 180*1-(1-2)180
= 180+180
= 360
So true for n = 1

(2) Assume true for n = k
180k-(k-2)180 = 360

(3) Prove true for n = k+1
x = 180(k+1)-(k+1-2)180
= 180k+180-180k-180+360
= [360+(k-2)180]+180-180k-180+360 --- using assumption
= 360+180k-360+180-180k-180+360
= 360

It is true for n = K+1 if true for n = k. Since it is true for n = 1 it is true for n = 1+1 = 2, n = 3 etc and hence all integer n > 0.


Is that right?
 
Last edited:

lyounamu

Reborn
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
9,989
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
bored of sc said:
(1) n = 1, x = sum of exterior angles, s = sum of interior angles = (n-2)180
x+s = 180n
x = 180n-s
x = 180*1-(1-2)180
= 180+180
= 360
So true for n = 1

(2) Assume true for n = k
180k-(k-2)180 = 360

(3) Prove true for n = k+1
x = 180(k+1)-(k+1-2)180
= 180k+180-180k-180+360
= [360+(k-2)180]+180-180k-180+360 --- using assumption
= 360+180k-360+180-180k-180+360
= 360

It is true for n = K+1 if true for n = k. Since it is true for n = 1 it is true for n = 1+1 = 2, n = 3 etc and hence all integer n > 0.


Is that right?
That's very good.
 

lyounamu

Reborn
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
9,989
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
bored of sc said:
So are you sure it's correct?
but there are some flaws...you sure n=1? because you cannot use n=1 or n=2

so you should alter n=1 thing-o. start with n=3 and n>=3 always
 

bored of sc

Active Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
2,314
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
lyounamu said:
but there are some flaws...you sure n=1? because you cannot use n=1 or n=2

so you should alter n=1 thing-o. start with n=3 and n>=3 always
Oh yeah, start with a triangle.
 

Timothy.Siu

Prophet 9
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,449
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
addikaye03 said:
Anyone got anymore q?
do mine please

All the letters of the word ENCUMBRANCE are arranged in a line. Find the total number of arrangements, which contain all the vowels in alphabetical order but separated by at least one consonant.
 

Trebla

Administrator
Administrator
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
8,171
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
I had a go at it (posted working on the thread created by Timothy.Siu) and got 7560. I have a lot of doubts around that number though.
One thing I can say without doubt is that it's very horrible. lol
 

addikaye03

The A-Team
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
1,267
Location
Albury-Wodonga, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Trebla said:
I had a go at it (posted working on the thread created by Timothy.Siu) and got 7560. I have a lot of doubts around that number though.
One thing I can say without doubt is that it's very horrible. lol
Ur solution is amazing. I dont know if its right.. but i understand it. Well done anyway:) lol
 

Timothy.Siu

Prophet 9
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,449
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
addikaye03 said:
Ur solution is amazing. I dont know if its right.. but i understand it. Well done anyway:) lol
i've asked a few people and the answers i get range from 100k-500k....but now even less lol
 

Aerath

Retired
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
10,169
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Timothy.Siu said:
i've asked a few people and the answers i get range from 100k-500k....but now even less lol
Hmmm, so where did my answer of: "Fuck off, don't ask me perms and combs questions" fit in? :p
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top