mreditor16
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2014
- Messages
- 3,169
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2014
i got the same as well excpet i might have screwed up 13b loool oh wellyou agree with all numerical answers?
if so, I am so fkin happy
omg I am so fkin happy, no sillies without checkingi got the same as well excpet i might have screwed up 13b loool oh well
Dw bro. Ur good. What do u think you got /100?omg I am so fkin happy, no sillies without checking
hoping, just need to confirm with carret's solutions
not sure yet, will wait for Carret's solutions and then will post my prediction in the "predict your mark thread"Dw bro. Ur good. What do u think you got /100?
Oritenot sure yet, will wait for Carret's solutions and then will post my prediction in the "predict your mark thread"
Dw I did similar for other questions in mcquite obviously yes
i read "minimum" instead of "maximum"
That isn't valid because you showed that PQ is parallel to the tangent, but it doesn't necessarily touch the hyperbola.for 13cii) I said that if PQ is tangential to hyperbola at M then gradient of PQ = gradient of tangent at M. And then I showed that. Is this a valid "proof"? Will I lose marks for bad style?
What if u also have mentioned that PQ has a midpoint M thus PQ passes through M?That isn't valid because you showed that PQ is parallel to the tangent, but it doesn't necessarily touch the hyperbola.
That isn't a property that can just be stated.What if u also have mentioned that PQ has a midpoint M thus PQ passes through M?
But it's given that M is the midpoint of PQ and also M lies on the hyperbola from (i)That isn't valid because you showed that PQ is parallel to the tangent, but it doesn't necessarily touch the hyperbola.
It gives you in the paperThat isn't a property that can just be stated.