Si91Anne
New Member
Re: How was modern Exam?
haha maybe you should look into switching pen brands.inter108 said:
haha maybe you should look into switching pen brands.inter108 said:
mate look at you. your a complete mess. you got 32% for the trials last of the year you fucking dooschmattmeadows said:hahah you fucking cock sucking prick
you did shie mate
That is amazing.imqt said:overall a good paper
RUSSIA - 13 pages
Trotsky - 18 pages
COLD War - 16 pages
LOL exactly my thoughtSi91Anne said:That is amazing.
Now i feel uncomfortable knowing people like you are my competition :\ haha
Lol 32% i would get more then that leaving after 1st hour. :/suckmyc0ck2101 said:mate look at you. your a complete mess. you got 32% for the trials last of the year you fucking doosch
go suck another bong mate your gonna come last in the state you faggot
im gonna punch the biggest romper tonight hahahha
WTF 18 pages? ? ? ? wow was that even necessary? i was sturggling to write 4 wow you make me look retardedimqt said:overall a good paper
RUSSIA - 13 pages
Trotsky - 18 pages
COLD War - 16 pages
I agree it was alot to talk about in 45 mins.... but wasn't the question about the impact of the strategies... that led me to talk about which strategies on both sides had the greatest impact and which ones failed, leaving out those middle ones. tbh it was a VERY broad question basically telling us... "hey, write what you learnt in this topic!" - would be interesting to see how it is markednayxx said:War in the Pacific - FAIL!!! Gosh, who th eff came up with that question, I'd like to see them write about both countries strategies in 45 minutes! Yeh that's what I thought.
Exactly lol. Gosh, I talked about economic strategies (sanctions) to Japan's aggressive conquest (blitzkrieg-like, jungle warfare) to 'island-hopping' (Nimitz and MacArthur, aerial + naval warfare) to Japan's use of kamikazes and 'fight to the death' strategies... and linked them together for impacts on the course and consequence of the war. Somehow I even related decolonisation :S But up to '51, gosh, only a paragraph on the objectives/strategies of SCAP and w/e, and how America strategically turned Japan into an anti-communist buffer country etc etc.patty4848 said:I agree it was alot to talk about in 45 mins.... but wasn't the question about the impact of the strategies... that led me to talk about which strategies on both sides had the greatest impact and which ones failed, leaving out those middle ones. tbh it was a VERY broad question basically telling us... "hey, write what you learnt in this topic!" - would be interesting to see how it is marked
Overall, not a bad exam... as with every other exam i've done so far, very broad questions!
suckmyc0ck2101 said:WTF 18 pages? ? ? ? wow was that even necessary? i was sturggling to write 4 wow you make me look retarded
Haha yeah, pretty much ended up with leni was a slut who Goebelled Goebells, Fucked Fanck and gave Hitler head.Si91Anne said:not directly but she supported Hitler. The topic made me angry.. but made for good debates in class. Most ended with "Man Hitler was a dickhead" Pretty intellectual
Explain what was Hitler's plans on signing the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact.brooke1990 said:Did anyone do conflict in europe?
if so HOW were we meant to stucture the german-soviet non aggression pact?
i think it was a great paper...but concerned about the structre of that essay.
PS : Leni is a loser. I made that very clear in that question.
I'm jealous. I just sat like an idiot thinking about what i was gonna write, it takes me about an hour of thinking to figure out wat bullshiz I'm gonna make.imqt said:lol guys its ok, i just had so much to write for all my questions and i couldnt stop lol!! my fingers were killing lol but oh well! (btw pen helps -- PILOT 07)
and about Trotsky, i had time so i went into more detail than necessary but more is better than no enough