I do Gwen Harwood. Which poems did you use? By the way, guess who.D.White said:So you can do a shallower analysis with less discussion of values, ideas and structure?
Good luck with that.
lol yes, i confess that is why i used it too.-may-cat- said:cuz father and child is a double poem, u dont have to study heaps and heaps of poems but still have sound knowledge
i personally hate that poem the most out of all the poems we had to study, i mean wtf, the little kid diembowles a owl!?krazedrealitii said:lol yes, i confess that is why i used it too.
Exactly what I didRampager said:I thought memorable ideas = universal concept and themes, such as life, the balance between life and death, love, memories, etc.
The 'memorable' theme/idea of age vs youth, passion vs academia.x-beckyyy-x said:i dont see how 'prize giving' relates to 'memorable ideas' ? my teacher always made it out it didnt fit in with the themes in the rest so i just never thought of using it..
also. i didnt talk about any "readings" because we never one focused on readings in class, will this mean i fail!!?
I think that's the thing... you can state that almost any element of Harwood's poetry is memorable. The memorability of something is technically a personal opinion, so as long as you support what you say with evidence, you could say that the composer's discussion of identity/passion/experience/childhood/etc is memorable.x-beckyyy-x said:i dont see how 'prize giving' relates to 'memorable ideas' ?
I did use first person but only abit. I used critics to show my personal response and opinions, so evaluating their conclusions in relation to the memorable ideas enabled an analysis of my personal response. I dont think there is any problem but to be safe i didnt use too much of it.Muchi said:Question: Did anyone use first person in their response?
I did... driven mostly by the fact that the question said... "In your view..."