miss_ripcurlgir
Member
And also, u gotta be careful for what u write for each historical perspective eg. u cant say that struturalist historians were intentionalist, vice versa
You could make up a quote, I guess. If you tagged it with well known historian. I wouldn't, because it'd be easier to simply reference them while discussing their ideas, rather than making up a quote.*caramel adele* said:you could probably get away with making up a quote belonging to a known historian, but dont actually make up a historian. as nwatts said the markers will be cluey as to historians.
but if you make up a quote along the lines of what you know they have said, and you use a known historian, they prob wont even kno.
i'd say no; but it's a very big can of worms. you should try to have some more 'indepth' historians, as opposed to the creators of a study guide. But if you can't find any/don't have any, and the exam is on thursday, quote excel all you like.Benno said:umm, can u qoute out of the Modern hiostory excel?
how would u do it?
well, with a ego like that I'm glad he isn't.~V~ said:It seems a little odd refuting a 'point' made last october, but i have to for the sake of sakes... It was in this forum
Cantwell was not the senior marker for indochina!! Yes, he was in the vietnam war, did a phd on the topic, wrote the textbook and was senior marker for a number of years... but now he marks history extension! He said he cannot stand the "band two trash from whoop-whoop high"... you know, poowee style...
anyway, just had to get that off my chest for cantwells sake (hes my modern and ext. teacher )
I know my lungs are my friend, but that's hardly here or there.AlleyCat said:pneumonics are your friend boys and girls!
It's not necessary. As many have said before, my teacher has also told us that while historiography is useful it is not necessary to gain a band six. He also said to paraphrase rather then quote if you have to, cos we have enough to learn as it is.Meads said:OK it is really important for me to get this cleared up now. Does historiography require us to quote from historians & texts? Like actually "QUOTE"? What I have done for two years is reference every paragraph to a historian & a text, but i have never quoted, I explain their argument.
This is an issue if I need actual quotes.