warning: generalisations.skynet89 said:that was just an aside. the topic was i never see an attractive girl from a struggling/poor background. which doesnt make sense because even without makeup/clothes you can still have good looks
OP = original poster; in this case being skynet89x.christina said:Sorry but whats OP? >< haha
I have a friend who was born in the former Soviet Union and she's downright stunning. But when you re-draw the lines on the map to accomodate the fall of communism in eastern Europe, she's from the continent's poorest nation, and they lived close to the border, so they really felt the bite of Ceseacsu's idiocy in Romania, when he seemed intent upon driving the country into the ground.skynet89 said:is it just me or do you rarely see beautiful girls who come from a poor/struggling background.
outlierObjectsInSpace said:I have a friend who was born in the former Soviet Union and she's downright stunning. But when you re-draw the lines on the map to accomodate the fall of communism in eastern Europe, she's from the continent's poorest nation, and they lived close to the border, so they really felt the bite of Ceseacsu's idiocy in Romania, when he seemed intent upon driving the country into the ground.
So how does that fall into your "rich girls are hot girls" hypothesis?
Opposite for me. I get annoyed that all the good looking girls are always no hopers.skynet89 said:this will probably spark a lot of arguments but anyway discuss.
is it just me or do you rarely see beautiful girls who come from a poor/struggling background.
was just curious because i went to bondi today for the first time in ages and everyone there(the girls at least) were just gorgeous.
is there some correlation in socio economic status / looks
i just think they've got a fair better lifestyle/ nutrition + money --> less stress from working to get into uni/job or something like that.
Nop.skynet89 said:is it just me or do you rarely see beautiful girls who come from a poor/struggling background.