relativity of simultaneity (1 Viewer)

Kimyia

Active Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2011
Messages
1,013
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2016
How do you explain the consequence of special relativity quantitatively for the relativity of simultaneity. qualitatively, I get, and mass dilation, time dilation, and length contraction I just use to formulas for a quantitative description but what about simultaneity? Also, what does it mean by the consequence of relativity?
 
Last edited:

Fizzy_Cyst

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2011
Messages
1,189
Location
Parramatta, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2001
Uni Grad
2005
I have never seen a question asked about quant, not been asked a question about it! But, I will give it a go.

Imagine you are on a train of length '2x' with a light beam source directly in the middle, so the distance to either end of the carriage is 'x' and at either end of the carriage there are light detectors, when hit, will instantaneously open the carriage door.

Now quantitatively, to the person inside the train (stationary relative to the train), the train is moving at a relative velocity of 0 -- hence you can figure out the time taken to hit either of the carriage doors as being distance/speed = x/c

Now, to the person outside, the train is moving at say 0.5c

So, you can figure out how far the train will have moved before the light beam hits the rear door

Distance travelled by the beam = speed x time

lets called the distance x'

x' = c x t

now x - x' corresponds to the amount which the train has shifted in the same time period

x - x' = c/2 x t

This tells you that the train has travelled half as far as the light beam, therefore we can say that the light beam has travelled (2/3)x and the train has travelled (1/3)x when the light has hit the rear door.

Now, after time 't', if the train has moved (1/3)x and the light has moved (2/3)x, then going towards the front of the train, it would only be (2/3)x from its point of origin and is now (2/3)x away from the door (keeping in mind the relative speed of light to the observer is always 'c' and train is moving at 'c/2')

Ok, it is late, but that is my attempt at explaining it somewhat quantitatively.

I hope it makes more sense to you then it did to me whilst I was typing it
 
Last edited:

Kimyia

Active Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2011
Messages
1,013
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2016
I eventually worked out something similar to that but it makes perfect sense :D Thank you very much!!!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top