nicksta_40 said:
how can u say the tigers will win when the caption on ur foto says Dragons for premiers 2005?
Once again, you have to read the whole thread to understand where I'm coming from. Refer to posts between myself and Suney_J for the reason.
Suney_J said:
ALL Dragons players deserve an AUSTRALIAN jumper. They ALL deserve their spot on the Tri-Nations tour at the end of the year. The Australian squad should just be all Dragons players
*Continues to wish that Suney_J dies a horribly painful death*
I would talk seriously about the issue of the Australian team and how it will be cheapened by the inclusion of Berrigan as left centre and Carroll at lock, but I can't be bothered. If Matt King isn't on the wing, the whole selection process will be a travesty.
Suney_J said:
Well you said that you wont vote for St. George for the same reason.
I only voted for St. George to take the pressure off the Doggies, but now there is no pressure what so ever on Canterbury taking out the premiership I honestly believe that the Dragons will win the title.
Its the same thing with Nathan Brown yesterday. He said that the Tigers are the team to beat, who is he kidding?
The Dragons are red hot favourites, and he knows it.
If we want to be pedantic, I actually DID vote for the Dragons, but then in these posts I've promoted the Tigers' agenda.
I think you'll find that Nathan Brown probably said that with a huge smirk on his face. Hehe.
If we are looking for the form teams of the competition, though, it's definitely the Tigers and the Knights
Tigers haven't lost a match for 10 weeks (they had a bye during the streak). Newcastle have 7 wins a golden point loss from their last nine weeks.
Dragons, on the other hand, have only six wins from their last nine weeks . . . definitely they are behind both Newcastle and Wests in terms of form.
Disclaimer: By no means whatsoever does the teams we have played compared to Wests have any bearing on this statement.