Will i be awarded 0 for this question? (2 Viewers)

[akim93]

Section 1 Question 5 (last question)

I MISSED THE FUCKEN COMPARE PART
oh well

and i just analysed my two texts
i did however mention they do show belonging through the notion of togetherness in homes
but i didn't link them..i wrote them seperately

will they give me a 0?
i wrote a page

 

[1337z4u12]

No way they wont give you a zero... You wont get a 4 - 5 band as this would require a synthesized comparison, but you might get a 3 if your analysis was in depth and used a range of techniques.

 

[Aerath]

You won't get 0, but I don't think you will get 5 either. You're probably capped at 4, if your analysis is spot on. But who knows - none of us know the marking scheme.

 

[zeleboy]

Section 1 Question 5 (last question)

I MISSED THE FUCKEN COMPARE PART
oh well

and i just analysed my two texts
i did however mention they do show belonging through the notion of togetherness in homes
but i didn't link them..i wrote them seperately

will they give me a 0?
i wrote a page

might get a 1 or 2 since you didn't answer 'verb'

 

[Aerath]

might get a 1 or 2 since you didn't answer 'verb'

Bullshit.

 

[eriito]

I give up. My life is over

 

[bell531]

I completely missed the 'compare' part of the question too, something I'm only just now realising. I did, accidentally, contrast the two texts right at the start by saying something like "text 3 uses perceptive, sensory language to provide a spiritual sense of belonging, whilst text 4 uses engaging personal language", but thats all I did. I did a wide range of techniques for each, and the analysis was fairly good, so I'm now hoping for 3, maybe 4 if they just skim read it.....



sigh

 

[Nuclear]

I completely missed the 'compare' part of the question too, something I'm only just now realising. I did, accidentally, contrast the two texts right at the start by saying something like "text 3 uses perceptive, sensory language to provide a spiritual sense of belonging, whilst text 4 uses engaging personal language", but thats all I did. I did a wide range of techniques for each, and the analysis was fairly good, so I'm now hoping for 3, maybe 4 if they just skim read it.....



sigh

Compare = Differences and/or Similarities.

 

[Phoenix Fury]

+1

 

[Drewx]

Compare = Differences and/or Similarities.

Thank god I though I'd stuffed it but thats exactly what I did. Weight off my shoulders there.

 

[Nuclear]

Haha, relax. It's in the past.

 

[jonjoony]

How long did you people write for? I only did a full page but my writing is real small

 

[Phoenix Fury]

2 pages for about 40 mins i think. Also small writing.

 

[Nuclear]

I think I did a page and a bit.

2 pages for about 40 mins i think. Also small writing.

I think he meant for the comparison question?

EDIT: Haha, 69 posts xD

 

[Phoenix Fury]

Well in that case 1/2 a page. Only 5 marks so mm.

 

[nosh22]

Damn. After reading this thread, I realised I didn't compare. I mean, I anaylsed and all and at the end I made a generalised statement about both texts. Agh!

 

[bellyy.loo]

You might get a 3-4.

 

[absorber]

Actually I'd guess 3 or 4 yeah

 

[madsam]

the five marker is the question they use to distinguish people in question 1
If your answer is poor, they will give you a low mark if you do a poor job

GG's hsc

 

[Fluorescent]

oh fuck i missed that part too lol T__________T
stupid exam nerves