Kurosaki
True Fail Kid
You're a tank, you got this Sy16 hours per day - I know, its pretty weak, I probably will only manage a 99.90 ATAR
sleep is optional
band 6 is compulsory
100 ATAR is necessary
You're a tank, you got this Sy16 hours per day - I know, its pretty weak, I probably will only manage a 99.90 ATAR
sleep is optional
band 6 is compulsory
100 ATAR is necessary
Relativity was ok, and that is the only thing I like in HSC Physics. Probably because I don't know much about Relativity in proper Physics, but I know enough of Classical Mechanics to hate on the dumbed down Space/Motors modules.Just interested, which parts [HSC Physics] are appealing to you? (Spi/Sy)
Well I do like topics but they aren't covered too deeply to my liking.Um physics syllabus: your likey parts.
That is a good idea, and has been proposed before. But the Board isn't having it. Neither is ACARA.If it means to create a 3U Physics to cater to Calculus students, I would be happy to do it.
Yes but still... you have to cater for everyone (people of all mathematical abilities).Relativity was ok, and that is the only thing I like in HSC Physics. Probably because I don't know much about Relativity in proper Physics, but I know enough of Classical Mechanics to hate on the dumbed down Space/Motors modules.
In regards to why Physics needs to be more Mathsy, Maths is the language of Physics, there is no denying it at all. Classical Mechanics was pretty much based on Calculus, to have some sort of Physics course without calculus is just horrible.
If it means to create a 3U Physics to cater to Calculus students, I would be happy to do it.
To cater to anglo students (srs)The 2001 reform...why!??!
The level of understanding required in Physics is still there.... compared to many subjects, Physics is like a different level when it comes to 'understanding'.About all this thinking stuff- I would say 2012 HSC required quite a lot of thinking. The two satellites question with geostationary orbit one is all thinking, the projectile was very hard by physics standards and that electricity distribution was a nice question imo
Evidence/basis?To cater to anglo students (srs)
This is BoS not a tea party for princes and princesses (except Aysce, Vietnamese prince the 22nd)You guys are so mean.
Agreed.About all this thinking stuff- I would say 2012 HSC required quite a lot of thinking. The two satellites question with geostationary orbit one is all thinking, the projectile was very hard by physics standards and that electricity distribution was a nice question imo
Good.I feel left out
:'( heheAbout all this thinking stuff- I would say 2012 HSC required quite a lot of thinking. The two satellites question with geostationary orbit one is all thinking, the projectile was very hard by physics standards and that electricity distribution was a nice question imo
Absolutely none, but there is no other reason to dumb down the science courses. I was looking at one pre-2001 Physics paper, and if you had the right elective all soft science could be avoided.Evidence/basis?
Fine, I accept that its not ALL soft-science, but there is still some in the Physics courseAbout all this thinking stuff- I would say 2012 HSC required quite a lot of thinking. The two satellites question with geostationary orbit one is all thinking, the projectile was very hard by physics standards and that electricity distribution was a nice question imo