Search results

ah...context issue then i'm the last person to be saying stuff like this, but just accept it, deal, and move on

that is giving porn way too much credit, imo

i'd think it not that hard to find someone else willing to get you to moan.

All every woman really wants, be it mother, senator, nun, is some serious deep-dickin'.

I'm with schroedinger 100% especially considering how badly blockers tend to be....i remember that astronomy sites used to get filtered for the term "naked eye observing" to do this would be about on par with, say, banning sites because they have cartoons that some might find...

hey, i just said not as easily. still quite possible.....and it depends on the psychological gravity of the guy...the stronger, the harder to not be captured by

because jerks are arrogant. thusly, they have inflated egos. this increases their psychological mass significantly, giving them a mental gravitational attraction, trapping girls in the gravity well. this is also why girls get faster the closer they get to jerks before actually having sex with...

and if that makes you a murderer, does the fact that people are arrested, put in jail, and not released when they want to go make you an accomplice to kidnapping and imprisonment? isn't that the same thing, the gov't doing something that a private citizen would be considered a criminal for doing?

well, i think not so much hilarious, as frustrating...frustrated laughter, that might work. either way, i'd reckon and fear yoda's far more in the right direction than inner_child i don't see why hurting would enter into it though.

i do agree with not-that-bright, both on that there are more important things to be learning, and that just because someone is trying to get science to match their religion that that doesn't mean suddenly their religion is on par with sceince as far as accuracy goes. personally, i'm not going...

this makes it perhaps all the more telling that the only time i've had a partner not just quiet....it was moer of a...i wouldn't say laughter, per se... but it was more like depressed laughter. i don't know how one would describe it precisely

you're acting like the internet isn't for spreading random generalisations with little to no basis

also worthy of pointing out is how many innocent iraqis were killed by the actions of the u.s. vs how many were killed by people that were supposedly acting in the best interest of iraqis

could we also stipulate you research the meaning of words before you use them? how are we to debate your points when you mean things other than what you actually do say?

he's got a point. at least men are consistant

science is a system of logic, religion is a belief system that relies on faith without proof. they're not the same at all. where was there discrimination? the stuff you said yourself was that the jobs were lost out to people with greater educational backgrounds.

so i take it you already feel guilty for being responsible for kidnapping people (arresting people), holding them against their will (keeping them in jail), and extortion (any fines the gov't has people pay so taht the first two don't happen)?

while i understand your moral highground point, the idea is that its NOT the same. if you heard abotu a murderer, so you tracked them down and killed them yourself, thats one thing, but having a system of laws that set punishments isn't the same as one person deciding to kill someone based...

Re: should gays be allowed to marry in NSW if i recall my bio right, there's no such thing as a true hemaphrodite in humanity, it is still either male or female, just that sometimes the characteristics are stunted. anyway, i'm not saying that the historical definition of marriage is correct...

the expansion of the universe is not properly called a doppler shift because we consider a doppler shift to be caused by an object moving towards or away from an observer. in the case of very distant objects, though, the redshift that is perceived is not from a velocity moving away but...