Search results

There cant be infinite universes out there. I cant remember why though. And it doesnt really matter if a civilisation is unlikely to be able to reach that level of technololgy. If it can, then they would make heaps of fake universes and so ours is probably fake. Think this through a bit, because...

The thoery actually explains a lot. For one it explains we are data. Thats a pretty big explanation about our existance. I think you mean observations. But like I said before, the new theory can still be right. I think this is pretty similar to religion actually. Hey it could be a new cult...

Your thinking just like the primitive people of the ancient world. Ptolomey's earth centred view of the universe was a better predictor of the movements of the stars yet Copernicus was right in his heliocentric. He just added hypotheses and gave a lot of maybes and yet he was right. Therefore it...

Occam's razor states that all things being equal in terms of a theory, then just choose the simplest one. Of course its by no means perfect but its a rule of thumb. For the first point, I don't think you can say there both equally valid. I'm leaning towards it being possible because I think we...

Well, I have no idea why it has anything against Christianity, and I'm not an expert on the subject. From what I have heard, it can mean people interpreting a text different to each person and it doesn't matter what the composer thought. Its the part where you can just disregard the composer of...

Our universe could be paused you know? And we'd never know. Someone could've paused it for a billion years and then pressed play again. To us, no time would've passed at all. In that way glitches could be fixed. Who knows, we could even be rewinded to when the bug first appeared And for occhams...

There is a good chance that we are living in a simulated reality. It requires the assumption that technology could get to the point that it could simulate a being that is conscience of their being but unaware of their simulated nature. If that is possible then, it is not probable that some...

I really doubt this statement. The percentage really depends on the difficulty of the test. Let's say one school has a easy test and everyone gets 90-95% and another school has a hard test and mostly everyone get 70-80%. You can't say that a person from one school is better than the other...

Lol, I am thinking outside the box you know? The problem is I might be thinking too far out of the box, because of Post Modernism:angry:, that false thing taught in schools.

Well according to the article in the beginning, high IQ people tend not to believe in God, and I guess they're smart enough to imagine something from nothing. Maybe actually there too smart for there own good or maybe they just havent reached a high enough level.

So I assume you support communism by your display picture. Just wondering, how did all those full communist countries do anyway? Arent they all being beat by all of the 1st world countries? Shows your intelligence is low if even now u cant see how crappy communism is and adding more proof that...

Most religious people dont believe in Noahs Ark. You must know that in their time, the world they knew must have been very small so they wouldve thought it possible for every animal to get to the ark. You sound pretty harsh to call your sister dumb btw in a forum with many people viewing. That...

Rationality and religion go hand-in-hand just by definition! What more proof is needed?

Oh I quite agree its balony. Btw, but wats a theology? Sry I'm to dumb to no but of course it must be balony for ressons I will not giv.

I totally agree that we should not use that argument but I only used the reverse of it in this argument because the "athiest" argument existed in the first place and to show that because my arguement is invalid, the other has to be too! And sorry for that last sentence, I wasn't focused when I...

Its not really an arguement if you actually understand. Huuu, lemme explain from the beginning of what I meant then. If an athiest says you can't believe in religion because high IQ people mostly don't believe in God, I can say that hey person X whos really smart believes in God. In other...

Nonono, don't you see the point. If a person with high intelligence believes in God, then can say its credible to believe in God because an intelligent person believes. And theyre not saying "Who do you think you are for not believing in God?", theyre just saying its plausible to believe in...

Most theists are open to evidence against God. Atheists I know do not "merely acknowledge" no evidence about God. They just go on a long rant about why God does not exist (just like Dawkin's book). They do NOT just say there is no evidence for God. They think they are so smart with their high...

So there u go! NONE of the top 1000 highest IQ people are athiests. Go God!

Me?!!? Learn stats?!?!!? Oh, u crack me up!! I'd know more stats than 90% of people. And I even know how to intepret them. I know that in a survey that said 99% of people liked porn, 1% was lying. HEY wearingmyrolex! Stop tryin to frame me:)