Mysterious X
New Member
Section 1 - Frankenstein/Blade Runner was pretty good. I talked about how a sense of identity is found by exploring human identity and what it means to be human, and how the values at the core of that question were what created a sense of identity. Talked about how unnatural creation and the "god complex" experienced by Frankenstein and Tyrell disrupted the natural order and balance of things.
Section 2 - Hamlet....fuck!!!!!! Such a painful question, I talked about the loyalty of Hamlet to his father, and how this loyalty was integral to the development of the themes of melancholy and indecision. I probably stretched it too much and did shit in this one, others who did Hamlet should tell me if this is a valid way to intepret the question (y).
Section 3 - Justice Game, not too bad. I talked about how whilst conflicting perspectives contribute to a variety of intepretations (or whatever the question said exactly), that if one perspective is more heavily biased in a text, that the variety of intepretations significantly narrows. And yeahh.
What do you guys think of how I attacked the questions? Thank god English is over!!!! Worst subject ever
Section 2 - Hamlet....fuck!!!!!! Such a painful question, I talked about the loyalty of Hamlet to his father, and how this loyalty was integral to the development of the themes of melancholy and indecision. I probably stretched it too much and did shit in this one, others who did Hamlet should tell me if this is a valid way to intepret the question (y).
Section 3 - Justice Game, not too bad. I talked about how whilst conflicting perspectives contribute to a variety of intepretations (or whatever the question said exactly), that if one perspective is more heavily biased in a text, that the variety of intepretations significantly narrows. And yeahh.
What do you guys think of how I attacked the questions? Thank god English is over!!!! Worst subject ever
Last edited: